These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22776846)
41. Subthreshold noise facilitates the detection and discrimination of visual signals. Sasaki H; Sakane S; Ishida T; Todorokihara M; Kitamura T; Aoki R Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 436(2):255-8. PubMed ID: 18400398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Visual learning with reliable and unreliable features. Orhan AE; Michel MM; Jacobs RA J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):2.1-15. PubMed ID: 20462303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Some observations on contrast detection in noise. Goris RL; Zaenen P; Wagemans J J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):4.1-15. PubMed ID: 18831640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. From perceptive fields to Gestalt. Spillmann L Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():67-92. PubMed ID: 17027381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities. Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A model of neural mechanisms in monocular transparent motion perception. Raudies F; Neumann H J Physiol Paris; 2010; 104(1-2):71-83. PubMed ID: 19900543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. No troubles with bubbles: a reply to Murray and Gold. Gosselin F; Schyns PG Vision Res; 2004 Mar; 44(5):471-7; discussion 479-82. PubMed ID: 14680772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pseudorandom sequences in the study of evoked potentials. Srebro R; Wright W Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():98-112. PubMed ID: 6953911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The spatio-temporal tuning of the mechanisms in the control of saccadic eye movements. White BJ; Kerzel D; Gegenfurtner KR Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3886-97. PubMed ID: 16879855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of auditory noise on the psychophysical detection of visual signals: cross-modal stochastic resonance. Manjarrez E; Mendez I; Martinez L; Flores A; Mirasso CR Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17276601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Area summation in human visual system: psychophysics, fMRI, and modeling. Nurminen L; Kilpeläinen M; Laurinen P; Vanni S J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov; 102(5):2900-9. PubMed ID: 19710383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions. Fründ I; Wichmann FA; Macke JH J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24944238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies. Dai H; Micheyl C Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):770-88. PubMed ID: 22844984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Visual perception: shaping what we see. Leopold DA Curr Biol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):R10-2. PubMed ID: 12526756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparison between human and machine labelling of image regions. Clark AA; Trościanko T; Campbell NW; Thomas BT Perception; 2000; 29(9):1127-38. PubMed ID: 11144824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Classification images in a very general decision model. Murray RF Vision Res; 2016 Jun; 123():26-32. PubMed ID: 27174841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Estimation of nonlinear psychophysical kernels. Neri P J Vis; 2004 Feb; 4(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 15005649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]