These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22777014)

  • 1. Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin's really dangerous idea.
    Prum RO
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2253-65. PubMed ID: 22777014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection: Another Darwinian process.
    Gayon J
    C R Biol; 2010 Feb; 333(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 20338530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.
    Ryan MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin.
    Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?
    Jones AG; Ratterman NL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jun; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10001-8. PubMed ID: 19528643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Darwin and sexual selection: One hundred years of misunderstanding.
    Veuille M
    C R Biol; 2010 Feb; 333(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 20338531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual selection is a form of social selection.
    Lyon BE; Montgomerie R
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2266-73. PubMed ID: 22777015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PERSPECTIVE: INDIRECT MATE CHOICE, COMPETITION FOR MATES, AND COEVOLUTION OF THE SEXES.
    Wiley RH; Poston J
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1371-1381. PubMed ID: 28565703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.
    Brennan PL; Prum RO
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2324-38. PubMed ID: 22777020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.
    Tobias JA; Montgomerie R; Lyon BE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2274-93. PubMed ID: 22777016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual and social competition: broadening perspectives by defining female roles.
    Rubenstein DR
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2248-52. PubMed ID: 22777013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals.
    Prum RO
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3085-100. PubMed ID: 20633044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Darwin Versus Wallace: Esthetic Evolution and Preferential Mate Choice.
    Davis AC; Arnocky S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():862385. PubMed ID: 35693523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 21890230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endless forms of sexual selection.
    Lindsay WR; Andersson S; Bererhi B; Höglund J; Johnsen A; Kvarnemo C; Leder EH; Lifjeld JT; Ninnes CE; Olsson M; Parker GA; Pizzari T; Qvarnström A; Safran RJ; Svensson O; Edwards SV
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7988. PubMed ID: 31720113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.