These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22777733)

  • 1. Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR; Behmer LP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1446-60. PubMed ID: 22777733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory event files: integrating auditory perception and action planning.
    Zmigrod S; Hommel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19304624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature binding across different visual dimensions.
    Ward R; Arend I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1406-15. PubMed ID: 22688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How much attention does an event file need?
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1067-82. PubMed ID: 16262499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 16846292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transitional information in spatial serial memory: path characteristics affect recall performance.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Mayberry M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):412-27. PubMed ID: 15910128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How color enhances visual memory for natural scenes.
    Spence I; Wong P; Rusan M; Rastegar N
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16371136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of sequence length on the execution of familiar keying sequences: lasting segmentation and preparation?
    Verwey WB
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Dec; 35(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 14607772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.