268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22779281)
1. Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months.
Kaiser E; Thurnay S; Markgraf D; Pack S; Grender J; Hengehold D; Warren PR; Wehrbein H; Erbe C
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 22779281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brush head composition, wear profile, and cleaning efficacy: an assessment of three electric brush heads using in vitro methods.
Kaiser E; Meyners M; Markgraf D; Stoerkel U; von Koppenfels R; Adam R; Soukup M; Wehrbein H; Erbe C
J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(2):19-25. PubMed ID: 25122978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.
Conforti NJ; Cordero RE; Liebman J; Bowman JP; Putt MS; Kuebler DS; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR
J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A six-week clinical evaluation of the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with a novel brush head utilizing angled CrissCross bristles versus a sonic toothbrush.
Klukowska M; Grender JM; Conde E; Goyal CR; Qaqish J
J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(2):6-12. PubMed ID: 25122976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating power brush versus a marketed sonic brush with self-adjusting technology in reducing plaque and gingivitis.
Klukowska M; Grender JM; Conde E; Goyal CR
J Clin Dent; 2013; 24(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24282870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of 3 toothbrush treatments on plaque removal in orthodontic patients assessed with digital plaque imaging: a randomized controlled trial.
Erbe C; Klukowska M; Tsaknaki I; Timm H; Grender J; Wehrbein H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):760-6. PubMed ID: 23726325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of new and 3-month-old brush heads in the removal of plaque using a powered toothbrush.
Hogan LM; Daly CG; Curtis BH
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 17309587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluations of plaque removal efficacy: an advanced rotating-oscillating power toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush.
Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD; Walters PA; Warren PR; Cugini M; Goyal CR; Qaqish J
J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):106-11. PubMed ID: 18277740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical comparison of plaque removal and gingival bleeding reduction by two different brush heads on a sonic toothbrush.
Harpenau L
J Clin Dent; 2000; 11(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 11460280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush to a new sonic brush in the reduction of gingivitis and plaque.
Klukowska M; Grender JM; Conde E; Ccahuana-Vasquez RA; Goyal CR
J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(2):26-31. PubMed ID: 25122979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating battery-powered toothbrush and a standard manual toothbrush.
Dörfer CE; von Bethlenfalvy ER; Staehle HJ; Pioch T
Am J Dent; 2001 Nov; 14 Spec No():25B-28B. PubMed ID: 12003484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Video instruction to establish a panel of experts to compare tooth cleaning by 4 electric toothbrushes.
Renton-Harper P; Addy M; Newcombe RG
J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 28(10):917-22. PubMed ID: 11686809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A robot system for evaluating plaque removal efficiency of toothbrushes in vitro.
Ernst CP; Willershausen B; Driesen G; Warren PR; Hilfinger P
Quintessence Int; 1997 Jul; 28(7):441-5. PubMed ID: 9477892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cleaning efficacy of a new electric toothbrush.
Driesen GM; Warren PR; Hilfinger P
Am J Dent; 1998 Sep; 11(Spec No):S7-11. PubMed ID: 10530093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of two electric toothbrushes with respect to plaque removal and subject preference.
Sharma NC; Galustians J; Qaqish J; Cugini M
Am J Dent; 1998 Sep; 11(Spec No):S29-33. PubMed ID: 10530097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Kleber CJ; Cugini M
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 3(4):95-103. PubMed ID: 12666948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plaque removal efficacy of oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes: review of six comparative clinical trials.
Grender J; Williams K; Walters P; Klukowska M; Reick H
Am J Dent; 2013 Apr; 26(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 24073528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype power toothbrush compared to a positive control manual toothbrush.
Williams K; Haun J; Dockter K; Ferrante A; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 14579873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
