These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22779483)

  • 1. Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.
    Schwartz A; McDermott JH; Shinn-Cunningham B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):357-68. PubMed ID: 22779483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context effects in the discriminability of spatial cues.
    Maier JK; McAlpine D; Klump GM; Pressnitzer D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):319-28. PubMed ID: 20033247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Lever C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2178-89. PubMed ID: 14587615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing interaural cues in sound segregation by young and middle-aged brains.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Besing J; Romei LL; Depierro A; Cooper D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):453-8. PubMed ID: 19928398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preserved use of spatial cues for sound segregation in a case of spatial deafness.
    Thiran AB; Clarke S
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 12753964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weighting of spatial and spectro-temporal cues for auditory scene analysis by human listeners.
    Bremen P; Middlebrooks JC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59815. PubMed ID: 23527271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-acuity spatial stream segregation.
    Middlebrooks JC
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():491-9. PubMed ID: 23716256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetric transfer of sound localization learning between indistinguishable interaural cues.
    Sand A; Nilsson ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 232(6):1707-16. PubMed ID: 24566800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory grouping.
    Darwin CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 1997 Dec; 1(9):327-33. PubMed ID: 21223942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
    Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Segregating two simultaneous sounds in elevation using temporal envelope: Human psychophysics and a physiological model.
    Johnson JS; O'Connor KN; Sutter ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 26233004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.
    Popham S; Boebinger D; Ellis DPW; Kawahara H; McDermott JH
    Nat Commun; 2018 May; 9(1):2122. PubMed ID: 29844313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.
    Middlebrooks JC; Onsan ZA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3896-911. PubMed ID: 23231120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separation of concurrent broadband sound sources by human listeners.
    Best V; van Schaik A; Carlile S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):324-36. PubMed ID: 14759025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.
    Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA; Eddins AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):737-748. PubMed ID: 31242052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences.
    Nilsson ME; Schenkman BN
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():223-232. PubMed ID: 26433052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination and streaming of speech sounds based on differences in interaural and spectral cues.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1674. PubMed ID: 28964066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
    Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.