BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22779497)

  • 21. Zenk expression in auditory regions changes with breeding condition in male Black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).
    Phillmore LS; Veysey AS; Roach SP
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 225(2):464-72. PubMed ID: 21854811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integration over song classification replicates: song variant analysis in the hihi.
    Ranjard L; Withers SJ; Brunton DH; Ross HA; Parsons S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2542-51. PubMed ID: 25994687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise.
    Zollinger SA; Slater PJB; Nemeth E; Brumm H
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1860):. PubMed ID: 28794216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The learning advantage: bird species that learn their song show a tighter adjustment of song to noisy environments than those that do not learn.
    Ríos-Chelén AA; Salaberria C; Barbosa I; Macías Garcia C; Gil D
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2171-80. PubMed ID: 22905893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are there species-universal categories in bird song phonology and syntax? A comparative study of chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs), zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata), and swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana).
    Lachlan RF; Verhagen L; Peters S; Cate CT
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 20175600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bird calls: their potential for behavioral neurobiology.
    Marler P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1016():31-44. PubMed ID: 15313768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of climate on acoustic signals: does atmospheric sound absorption matter for bird song and bat echolocation?
    Snell-Rood EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1650-8. PubMed ID: 22352535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Responses of a sub-oscine bird during playback: effects of different song variants and breeding period.
    Ríos-Chelén AA; Garcia CM
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 17207941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Different behavioural responses to anthropogenic noise by two closely related passerine birds.
    Francis CD; Ortega CP; Cruz A
    Biol Lett; 2011 Dec; 7(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 21613284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Degradation of rural and urban great tit song: testing transmission efficiency.
    Mockford EJ; Marshall RC; Dabelsteen T
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28242. PubMed ID: 22174781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of auditory distractors on song discrimination in male canaries (Serinus canaria).
    Appeltants D; Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Balthazart J; Ball GF
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 15896531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Independent cultural evolution of two song traditions in the chestnut-sided warbler.
    Byers BE; Belinsky KL; Bentley RA
    Am Nat; 2010 Oct; 176(4):476-89. PubMed ID: 20712515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency modulation during song in a suboscine does not require vocal muscles.
    Amador A; Goller F; Mindlin GB
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2383-9. PubMed ID: 18287554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual chunking in the self-produced songs of Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica).
    Suge R; Okanoya K
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):515-23. PubMed ID: 20039089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Call-based species recognition in black-capped chickadees.
    Charrier I; Sturdy CB
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 16139440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits.
    Mockford EJ; Marshall RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Aug; 276(1669):2979-85. PubMed ID: 19493902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren.
    Illes AE; Hall ML; Vehrencamp SL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1596):1907-12. PubMed ID: 16822751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Towards quantification of vocal imitation in the zebra finch.
    Tchernichovski O; Mitra PP
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2002 Dec; 188(11-12):867-78. PubMed ID: 12471487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of anthropogenic noise on individual identification via female song in Black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).
    Montenegro C; Service WD; Scully EN; Mischler SK; Sahu PK; Benowicz TJ; Fox KVR; Sturdy CB
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17530. PubMed ID: 34475418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between syllable repertoire similarity and pairing success in a passerine bird species with complex song.
    Garamszegi LZ; Zsebok S; Török J
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Feb; 295():68-76. PubMed ID: 22123372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.