These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22782056)

  • 1. A longitudinal study of the survival of interproximal root caries lesions restored with glass ionomer cement via a minimally invasive approach.
    Gilboa I; Cardash HS; Baharav H; Demko CA; Teich ST
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e224-30. PubMed ID: 22782056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A minimally invasive restorative approach for treatment of interproximal root caries lesions.
    Teich S; Gilboa I
    Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(7):611-4. PubMed ID: 21716990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries.
    Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):342-51. PubMed ID: 8695014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
    Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coverage of carious roots by a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
    Goldstein M; Nasatzky E; Goultschin J; Boyan B; Schwartz Z
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 12469749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration.
    Shinkai RS; Cury AA; Cury JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11203778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
    Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root Caries in Older Adults.
    Gregory D; Hyde S
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Aug; 43(8):439-45. PubMed ID: 26357814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The material science of minimally invasive esthetic restorations.
    Nový BB; Fuller CE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008; 29(6):338-46; quiz 347. PubMed ID: 18795638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcome of root caries restorations using ART and rotary techniques in institutionalized elders.
    Cruz Gonzalez AC; Marín Zuluaga DJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 May; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 27253146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months.
    Lo EC; Luo Y; Tan HP; Dyson JE; Corbet EF
    J Dent Res; 2006 Oct; 85(10):929-32. PubMed ID: 16998134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
    Mickenautsch S; Kopsala J; Rudolph MJ; Ogunbodede EO
    SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
    Attar N; Onen A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of root surface caries in vulnerable elderly patients: a review of the literature.
    Amer RS; Kolker JL
    Spec Care Dentist; 2013; 33(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 23600986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.