These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22782061)
61. An eighteen-month clinical evaluation of posterior restorations with fluoride releasing adhesive and composite systems. Akimoto N; Ohmori K; Hanabusa M; Momoi Y Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 21597208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites. van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth. Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM; Hamama HH J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 18792703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A clinical study of direct composite full-coverage crowns: long-term results. Alonso V; Caserio M Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 22335302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Class II composite restorations and proximal concavities: clinical implications and management. Patras M; Doukoudakis S Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 22788722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Alternatives to Traditional Posterior Direct Restorations. Shah P Dent Today; 2015 Mar; 34(3):114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 26349275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Oral diagnosis and treatment planning: part 8. Reviews and maintenance of restorations. Smales R; Yip K Br Dent J; 2012 Oct; 213(8):387-94. PubMed ID: 23099691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial caries removal restorations performed in primary teeth. Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Demarco FF; Garcia-Godoy F; De Araujo FB; Casagrande L Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 25000663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Conservative approach to restore the first molar with extensive destruction: A 30-month follow-up. Mondelli RF; Azevedo LM; Silva LM; Garrido AM; Ishikiriama SK; Mondelli J Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 23534051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Ten-year longitudinal clinical evaluation of a visible light cured posterior composite resin. Shimizu T; Kitano T; Inoue M; Narikawa K; Fujii B Dent Mater J; 1995 Dec; 14(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 8940551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Do Nanofilled/Nanohybrid Composites Allow for Better Clinical Performance of Direct Restorations Than Traditional Microhybrid Composites? A Systematic Review. Angerame D; De Biasi M Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):E191-E209. PubMed ID: 29570022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The Effect of Resin Composites and Polishing Procedure on Periodontal Tissue Parameters in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Nassar CA; de Moraes RC; Secundes MB; Bernardon P; Nassar PO; Camilotti V Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Dec; 22(4):146-51. PubMed ID: 26466438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Resin composite class I restorations: a 54-month randomized clinical trial. de Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Medeiros e Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Monteiro GQ; Montes MA Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):588-94. PubMed ID: 25084108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Clinical Performance of a Glass Hybrid Restorative in Extended Size Class II Cavities. Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Cakir FY Oper Dent; 2020; 45(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 31661352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]