These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22782377)

  • 1. Reply to comments on: Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Reito A; Puolakka T; Paakkala A; Pajamäki J
    Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1971. PubMed ID: 22782377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on Reito et al.: Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Bachhal V; Rangdal S; Saini G; Dhillon M
    Int Orthop; 2012 Jul; 36(7):1535-7. PubMed ID: 22584620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Reito A; Puolakka T; Paakkala A; Pajamäki J
    Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 21837449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impingement as a mechanism of dissociation of a metasul metal-on-metal liner.
    Malik A; Dorr LD; Long WT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):323.e13-6. PubMed ID: 18562156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements.
    Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone.
    Journé A; Sadaka J; Bélicourt C; Sautet A
    Int Orthop; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2205-9. PubMed ID: 22949124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy and reliability of preoperative templating for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Choi JK; Geller JA; Wang W; Nyce JD; Macaulay W
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):765-70. PubMed ID: 20870380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced-dose computed tomography is the most accurate method to measure ceramic hip resurfacing cup version.
    Saracco A; Grassi A; Romagnoli M; Camarda L; Logishetty K; Zaffagnini S; Cobb J
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 128():109040. PubMed ID: 32442835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Author reply: To PMID 23848217.
    van Susante JL
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):598-9. PubMed ID: 24432374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new technique for radiographic measurement of acetabular cup orientation.
    Derbyshire B; Diggle PJ; Ingham CJ; Macnair R; Wimhurst J; Jones HW
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 23896357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing.
    Gruen TA; Le Duff MJ; Wisk LE; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(16):1519-26. PubMed ID: 22204007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Reliable is the Acetabular Cup Position Assessment from Routine Radiographs?
    Carvajal Alba JA; Vincent HK; Sodhi JS; Latta LL; Parvataneni HK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():181-187. PubMed ID: 28852355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hip resurfacing. Occasionally, an alternative to replacement.
    Mayo Clin Health Lett; 2009 Feb; 27(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 19367775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The absence of a metal-on-metal bearing does not preclude the formation of a destructive pseudotumor in the hip--a case report.
    van Erve RH
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):598. PubMed ID: 24237423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system.
    Langton DJ; Sprowson AP; Mahadeva D; Bhatnagar S; Holland JP; Nargol AV
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 20022454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insufficient acetabular version increases blood metal ion levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Hart AJ; Skinner JA; Henckel J; Sampson B; Gordon F
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 469(9):2590-7. PubMed ID: 21656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy and inter-observer reliability of acetate templating in total hip arthroplasty.
    Kearney R; Shaikh AH; O'Byrne JM
    Ir J Med Sci; 2013 Sep; 182(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 23354493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acetabular cup malalignment after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a case for elective revision?
    Mai MC; Milbrandt JC; Hulsen J; Allan DG
    Orthopedics; 2009 Nov; 32(11):853. PubMed ID: 19902880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.