BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22783164)

  • 21. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Egocentric fairness perception: emotional reactions and individual differences in overt responses.
    Bediou B; Scherer KR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88432. PubMed ID: 24586326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resting-state network predicts the decision-making behaviors of the proposer during the ultimatum game.
    Li Y; Yang Q; Liu Y; Wang R; Zheng Y; Zhang Y; Si Y; Jiang L; Chen B; Peng Y; Wan F; Yu J; Yao D; Li F; He B; Xu P
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 37659391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Framing the ultimatum game: the contribution of simulation.
    Tomasino B; Lotto L; Sarlo M; Civai C; Rumiati R; Rumiati RI
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():337. PubMed ID: 23847507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.
    Sánchez-Amaro A; Rossano F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 288(1962):20211937. PubMed ID: 34727713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrophysiological Correlates of Social Decision-making: An EEG Investigation of a Modified Ultimatum Game.
    Moore M; Katsumi Y; Dolcos S; Dolcos F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 34(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 34673955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.
    Osiński J; Karbowski A; Rusek J; Reinholz A
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104513. PubMed ID: 34582937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neural substrates underlying the tendency to accept anger-infused ultimatum offers during dynamic social interactions.
    Gilam G; Lin T; Raz G; Azrielant S; Fruchter E; Ariely D; Hendler T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():400-11. PubMed ID: 26166623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Less Expectation, Less Pain: Low Wealth Alleviates Sense of Unfairness.
    Pei G; Jin J; Li T; Fang C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():571952. PubMed ID: 33995167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The anger-infused Ultimatum Game: A reliable and valid paradigm to induce and assess anger.
    Gilam G; Abend R; Shani H; Ben-Zion Z; Hendler T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29565609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in Social Decision-Making between Proposers and Responders during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG Study.
    Horat SK; Prévot A; Richiardi J; Herrmann FR; Favre G; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2017; 11():13. PubMed ID: 28744204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social Decision Making in Adolescents and Young Adults: Evidence From the Ultimatum Game and Cognitive Biases.
    Marchetti A; Baglio F; Castelli I; Griffanti L; Nemni R; Rossetto F; Valle A; Zanette M; Massaro D
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Feb; 122(1):135-154. PubMed ID: 29402178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Heartbeat and economic decisions: observing mental stress among proposers and responders in the ultimatum bargaining game.
    Dulleck U; Schaffner M; Torgler B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108218. PubMed ID: 25247817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.