These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22783164)

  • 41. Functions of the right DLPFC and right TPJ in proposers and responders in the ultimatum game.
    Speitel C; Traut-Mattausch E; Jonas E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 14(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 30690558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of Concomitant Benzodiazepines and Antidepressants Long-Term Use on Social Decision-Making: Results From the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Garcez H; Balaban S; Barbosa F; Pereira MR; Silveira C; Marques-Teixeira J; Gonçalves AR
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():915265. PubMed ID: 35814094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the relationship between emotional state and abnormal unfairness sensitivity in alcohol dependence.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Hanak C; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():983. PubMed ID: 26217293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. When More Is Better - Consumption Priming Decreases Responders' Rejections in the Ultimatum Game.
    Zürn M; Strack F
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2226. PubMed ID: 29326637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cognitive control and individual differences in economic ultimatum decision-making.
    De Neys W; Novitskiy N; Geeraerts L; Ramautar J; Wagemans J
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27107. PubMed ID: 22096522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Proposal Allocation Ratio as a Moderator of Interpersonal Responsibility Effects on Hostile Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Gong X; Xia LX; Sun Y; Guo L; Carpenter VC; Fang Y; Chen Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1959. PubMed ID: 29184518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Do different fairness contexts and facial emotions motivate 'irrational' social decision-making in major depression? An exploratory patient study.
    Radke S; Schäfer IC; Müller BW; de Bruijn ER
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 23910237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Suffering makes you egoist: acute pain increases acceptance rates and reduces fairness during a bilateral ultimatum game.
    Mancini A; Betti V; Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26008. PubMed ID: 22022492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Trustworthiness and Negative Affect Predict Economic Decision-Making.
    Nguyen CM; Koenigs M; Yamada TH; Teo SH; Cavanaugh JE; Tranel D; Denburg NL
    J Cogn Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 23(6):748-759. PubMed ID: 23493494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study.
    Csukly G; Polgár P; Tombor L; Réthelyi J; Kéri S
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 21035194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Expect the Worst! Expectations and Social Interactive Decision Making.
    Giorgetta C; Grecucci A; Graffeo M; Bonini N; Ferrario R; Sanfey AG
    Brain Sci; 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33946847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Testosterone Administration Related Differences in Brain Activation during the Ultimatum Game.
    Kopsida E; Berrebi J; Petrovic P; Ingvar M
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():66. PubMed ID: 26973448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Zheng L; Guo X; Zhu L; Li J; Chen L; Dienes Z
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 10(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 24847114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Pan Y; Jin J; Wan Y; Wu Y; Wang F; Xu S; Zhu L; Xu J; Rao H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Dec; 16(6):2497-2505. PubMed ID: 35821158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Morality is Supreme: The Roles of Morality, Fairness and Group Identity in the Ultimatum Paradigm.
    Liu W; Wang H; Zhu H; Zhu X; He X; Zhang W
    Psychol Res Behav Manag; 2022; 15():2049-2065. PubMed ID: 35971385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Equal status in Ultimatum Games promotes rational sharing.
    Han X; Cao S; Bao JZ; Wang WX; Zhang B; Gao ZY; Sánchez A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1222. PubMed ID: 29352130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Circadian rhythms and decision-making: a review and new evidence from electroencephalography.
    Correa Á; Alguacil S; Ciria LF; Jiménez A; Ruz M
    Chronobiol Int; 2020 Apr; 37(4):520-541. PubMed ID: 32000532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.
    Xu Q; Hu J; Qin Y; Li G; Zhang X; Li P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Apr; 44(6):2451-2464. PubMed ID: 36749642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.