These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22783853)

  • 1. Achieving 360° student feedback using SPaCE.
    Garry A; Stirling K
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 22783853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of SPaCE in delivering patient feedback.
    Clapham L; Allan L; Stirling K
    Clin Teach; 2016 Feb; 13(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 26638990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial.
    Perera J; Mohamadou G; Kaur S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills.
    Stevens A; Hernandez J; Johnsen K; Dickerson R; Raij A; Harrison C; DiPietro M; Allen B; Ferdig R; Foti S; Jackson J; Shin M; Cendan J; Watson R; Duerson M; Lok B; Cohen M; Wagner P; Lind DS
    Am J Surg; 2006 Jun; 191(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16720154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical student and faculty perceptions of volunteer outpatients versus simulated patients in communication skills training.
    Clever SL; Dudas RA; Solomon BS; Yeh HC; Levine D; Bertram A; Goldstein M; Shilkofski N; Cofrancesco J
    Acad Med; 2011 Nov; 86(11):1437-42. PubMed ID: 21952062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct observed procedural skills assessment in the undergraduate setting.
    McLeod R; Mires G; Ker J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 22783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands-on training?
    Stegmann K; Pilz F; Siebeck M; Fischer F
    Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):1001-8. PubMed ID: 22989134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulating the longitudinal doctor-patient relationship: experiences of simulated patients in successive consultations.
    Linssen T; van Dalen J; Rethans JJ
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 17727528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Constructive feedback. A strategy to enhance learning].
    Alves de Lima AE
    Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18416326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Six formats in simulated and standardized patients use, based on experiences of 13 undergraduate medical curricula in Belgium and the Netherlands.
    Rethans JJ; Grosfeld FJ; Aper L; Reniers J; Westen JH; van Wijngaarden JJ; van Weel-Baumgarten EM
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):710-6. PubMed ID: 22905657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The simulated patient's view on teaching: results from a think aloud study.
    Lingemann K; Campbell T; Lingemann C; Hölzer H; Breckwoldt J
    Acad Med; 2012 Feb; 87(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 22189885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explicitly linking teaching and assessment of communication skills.
    Cave J; Washer P; Sampson P; Griffin M; Noble L
    Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 17786744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical skills-related learning goals of senior medical students after performance feedback.
    Chang A; Chou CL; Teherani A; Hauer KE
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):878-85. PubMed ID: 21848715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
    Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation using simulated students for reliability of multiple standardized-patients scoring in clinical performance examinations.
    Park WB; Lee SA; Kim EA; Gwack J; Yoo KY; Shin JS; Lee YS
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):978-80. PubMed ID: 18158676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessors for communication skills: SPs or healthcare professionals?
    Liew SC; Dutta S; Sidhu JK; De-Alwis R; Chen N; Sow CF; Barua A
    Med Teach; 2014 Jul; 36(7):626-31. PubMed ID: 24787534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence.
    Engerer C; Berberat PO; Dinkel A; Rudolph B; Sattel H; Wuensch A
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):271. PubMed ID: 27756286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construction and validation of the Nijmegen Evaluation of the Simulated Patient (NESP): assessing simulated patients' ability to role-play and provide feedback to students.
    Bouter S; van Weel-Baumgarten E; Bolhuis S
    Acad Med; 2013 Feb; 88(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 23269298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of feedback from standardized patients on medical students' performance and perceptions of the neurological examination.
    Park JH; Son JY; Kim S; May W
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(12):1005-10. PubMed ID: 22225438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.