These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22783974)
1. Facilitating and inhibiting effects of priming and selection criteria in a sequence of dichotic listening trials. Saetrevik B Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 22783974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biased competition model accounts for negative priming in a free choice situation as residual effects of inhibitory conflict resolution. Saetrevik B Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jan; 468(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 19883734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening. Saetrevik B; Hugdahl K Neuropsychology; 2007 May; 21(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 17484591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and magnitude of laterality effects in dichotic listening with exogenous cueing. Voyer D Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):495-6. PubMed ID: 15223195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Mayr S; Buchner A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):932-43. PubMed ID: 16846289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stop task after-effects in schizophrenia: behavioral control adjustments and repetition priming. Enticott PG; Upton DJ; Bradshaw JL; Bellgrove MA; Ogloff JR Neurocase; 2012; 18(5):405-14. PubMed ID: 22124369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching. Koch I; Lawo V Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming. Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Koch I; Lawo V; Fels J; Vorländer M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1140-7. PubMed ID: 21553997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Tallus J; Hugdahl K; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():195-200. PubMed ID: 17920571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attention, reliability, and validity of perceptual asymmetries in the fused dichotic words test. Voyer D; Ingram JD Laterality; 2005 Nov; 10(6):545-61. PubMed ID: 16298885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverse target- and cue-priming effects of masked stimuli. Mattler U J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 17311481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dichotic listening and otoacoustic emissions: shared variance between cochlear function and dichotic listening performance in adults with normal hearing. Markevych V; Asbjørnsen AE; Lind O; Plante E; Cone B Brain Cogn; 2011 Jul; 76(2):332-9. PubMed ID: 21474228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming. Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using dichotic listening to study bottom-up and top-down processing in children and adults. Andersson M; Llera JE; Rimol LM; Hugdahl K Child Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 14(5):470-9. PubMed ID: 18608228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]