315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22784033)
1. Acceleration of protease effect on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm dispersal.
Park JH; Lee JH; Cho MH; Herzberg M; Lee J
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Oct; 335(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22784033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extracellular protease in Actinomycetes culture supernatants inhibits and detaches Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.
Park JH; Lee JH; Kim CJ; Lee JC; Cho MH; Lee J
Biotechnol Lett; 2012 Apr; 34(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 22160331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pattern differentiation in co-culture biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Yang L; Liu Y; Markussen T; Høiby N; Tolker-Nielsen T; Molin S
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 62(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 21595754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections.
Hou W; Sun X; Wang Z; Zhang Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antibiofilm activity of Streptomyces sp. BFI 230 and Kribbella sp. BFI 1562 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Kim YG; Lee JH; Kim CJ; Lee JC; Ju YJ; Cho MH; Lee J
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Dec; 96(6):1607-17. PubMed ID: 22722911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ionic liquid 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium demonstrates comparable antimicrobial and antibiofilm behavior to a cationic surfactant.
Venkata Nancharaiah Y; Reddy GK; Lalithamanasa P; Venugopalan VP
Biofouling; 2012; 28(10):1141-9. PubMed ID: 23092364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biofilm formation by different strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Pihl M; Davies JR; Chávez de Paz LE; Svensäter G
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 59(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 20528934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro production of biofilm in a flow cell system in a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus and determination of efficiency of ciprofloxacin against them.
Gupta S; Agarwal S; Sahoo DR; Muralidharan S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2011; 54(3):569-71. PubMed ID: 21934223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immobilization of proteases on chitosan for the development of films with anti-biofilm properties.
Elchinger PH; Delattre C; Faure S; Roy O; Badel S; Bernardi T; Taillefumier C; Michaud P
Int J Biol Macromol; 2015 Jan; 72():1063-8. PubMed ID: 25451753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The antimicrobial agent, Next-Science, inhibits the development of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on tympanostomy tubes.
Banerjee D; Tran PL; Colmer-Hamood JA; Wang JC; Myntti M; Cordero J; Hamood AN
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1909-14. PubMed ID: 26388185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Magalhães AP; Jorge P; Pereira MO
Crit Rev Microbiol; 2019; 45(5-6):712-728. PubMed ID: 31835971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibitory efficacy of various antibiotics on matrix and viable mass of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
Toté K; Berghe DV; Deschacht M; de Wit K; Maes L; Cos P
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2009 Jun; 33(6):525-31. PubMed ID: 19179053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The activity of ferulic and gallic acids in biofilm prevention and control of pathogenic bacteria.
Borges A; Saavedra MJ; Simões M
Biofouling; 2012; 28(7):755-67. PubMed ID: 22823343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNase1L2 suppresses biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
Eckhart L; Fischer H; Barken KB; Tolker-Nielsen T; Tschachler E
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 156(6):1342-5. PubMed ID: 17459041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Peganum harmala peptides on the transcriptional activity of biofilm related genes in sensitive and resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
Mirza R; Azeem M; Qaisar U
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2019 Sep; 32(5(Supplementary)):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 31894064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protease production by Staphylococcus epidermidis and its effect on Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.
Vandecandelaere I; Depuydt P; Nelis HJ; Coenye T
Pathog Dis; 2014 Apr; 70(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 24436195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ZnO nanoparticles inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence factor production.
Lee JH; Kim YG; Cho MH; Lee J
Microbiol Res; 2014 Dec; 169(12):888-96. PubMed ID: 24958247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Malachite green-conjugated multi-walled carbon nanotubes potentiate antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation of planktonic cells and biofilms of
Anju VT; Paramanantham P; Siddhardha B; Sruthil Lal SB; Sharan A; Alyousef AA; Arshad M; Syed A
Int J Nanomedicine; 2019; 14():3861-3874. PubMed ID: 31213806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential gene expression in planktonic and biofilm cells of multiple antibiotic-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus.
He X; Ahn J
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2011 Dec; 325(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 22092573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of oleic acid (cis-9-octadecenoic acid) on bacterial viability and biofilm production in Staphylococcus aureus.
Stenz L; François P; Fischer A; Huyghe A; Tangomo M; Hernandez D; Cassat J; Linder P; Schrenzel J
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2008 Oct; 287(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 18754790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
