These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22784232)
1. Acromioclavicular joint separations grades I-III: a review of the literature and development of best practice guidelines. Reid D; Polson K; Johnson L Sports Med; 2012 Aug; 42(8):681-96. PubMed ID: 22784232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment. Feichtinger X; Dahm F; Schallmayer D; Boesmueller S; Fialka C; Mittermayr R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 32748232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a hook plate versus patients managed non-operatively. Natera Cisneros LG; Sarasquete Reiriz J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Apr; 27(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 27734220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A Delphi consensus survey by Shoulder & Elbow Society, India (SESI). Shah D; Sahu D; Easwaran R; Kar A; Modi A; Tambe A; Babhulkar A; Pardiwala DN; Singh HP; Maheshwari J; Kumar K; Selvaraj K; Kumar DKP; Shetty DN; Kamat DN; Shah DP; Kocheeppan DP; Monga PP; Aggarwal DRK; Chidambaram DR; Pathak DS; Gajjar DS; Jos DS; Pandey DV Injury; 2024 Jun; 55 Suppl 2():111467. PubMed ID: 39098790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rehabilitation of acromioclavicular joint separations: operative and nonoperative considerations. Cote MP; Wojcik KE; Gomlinski G; Mazzocca AD Clin Sports Med; 2010 Apr; 29(2):213-28, vii. PubMed ID: 20226315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Zumstein MA; Schiessl P; Ambuehl B; Bolliger L; Weihs J; Maurer MH; Moor BK; Schaer M; Raniga S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jan; 26(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 28547587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Trainer G; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD Clin J Sport Med; 2008 Mar; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 18332693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Arthroscopic stabilisation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TighRope device]. Bajnar L; Bartoš R; Sedivý P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(6):386-90. PubMed ID: 24750965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges in Treating Acromioclavicular Separations: Current Concepts. Cook JB; Krul KP J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Oct; 26(19):669-677. PubMed ID: 30138294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral weighted radiographs are required for accurate classification of acromioclavicular separation: an observational study of 59 cases. Ibrahim EF; Forrest NP; Forester A Injury; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1900-5. PubMed ID: 26194267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Return to sport after acute acromioclavicular stabilization: a randomized control of double-suture-button system versus clavicular hook plate compared to uninjured shoulder sport athletes. Müller D; Reinig Y; Hoffmann R; Blank M; Welsch F; Schweigkofler U; Stein T Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Dec; 26(12):3832-3847. PubMed ID: 29980805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation: Conservative vs surgical approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis of current concepts in literature. Giai Via R; Bosco F; Giustra F; Lavia AD; Artiaco S; Risitano S; Giachino M; Massè A Injury; 2022 Oct; 53(10):3094-3101. PubMed ID: 35945090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Young men in sports are at highest risk of acromioclavicular joint injuries: a prospective cohort study. Skjaker SA; Enger M; Engebretsen L; Brox JI; Bøe B Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2039-2045. PubMed ID: 32270265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ruiz Ibán MA; Moreno Romero MS; Diaz Heredia J; Ruiz Díaz R; Muriel A; López-Alcalde J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2024-2038. PubMed ID: 32179968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of acromioclavicular dislocations. Post M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Nov; (200):234-47. PubMed ID: 3905114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial Commentary: Acute Treatment Including Cerclage Result in Best Surgical Outcomes for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separations. Rashid MS; Lo IK Arthroscopy; 2023 Nov; 39(11):2291-2292. PubMed ID: 37866871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can an acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separation be reduced and stabilized without surgery? A surgeon's experience. Maleitzke T; Maziak N; Plachel F; Winkler T; Moroder P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Dec; 140(12):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 33111203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]