202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22784476)
1. A multi-criteria decision analysis assessment of waste paper management options.
Hanan D; Burnley S; Cooke D
Waste Manag; 2013 Mar; 33(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 22784476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013.
Farmer TD; Shaw PJ; Williams ID
Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():266-76. PubMed ID: 25771762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps.
Garfì M; Tondelli S; Bonoli A
Waste Manag; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2729-39. PubMed ID: 19560912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparison of three management options for waste papers: bioethanol production, recycling and incineration with energy recovery.
Wang L; Templer R; Murphy RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Sep; 120():89-98. PubMed ID: 22784958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill sitting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran.
Sharifi M; Hadidi M; Vessali E; Mosstafakhani P; Taheri K; Shahoie S; Khodamoradpour M
Waste Manag; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2740-58. PubMed ID: 19477110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty.
Wibowo S; Deng H
Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():127-35. PubMed ID: 25804333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LCA-IWM: a decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems.
den Boer J; den Boer E; Jager J
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1032-45. PubMed ID: 17428653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to compare alternatives for the long-term management of surplus mercury.
Randall P; Brown L; Deschaine L; Dimarzio J; Kaiser G; Vierow J
J Environ Manage; 2004 May; 71(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15084358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK.
Yap HY; Nixon JD
Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():265-77. PubMed ID: 26275797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental evaluation of waste treatment scenarios for the towns Khanty-Mansiysk and Surgut, Russia.
Kaazke J; Meneses M; Wilke BM; Rotter VS
Waste Manag Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 23381971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrated assessment of a new Waste-to-Energy facility in Central Greece in the context of regional perspectives.
Perkoulidis G; Papageorgiou A; Karagiannidis A; Kalogirou S
Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1395-406. PubMed ID: 20061131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances.
Merrild H; Larsen AW; Christensen TH
Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1009-18. PubMed ID: 22265239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Waste management project's alternatives: A risk-based multi-criteria assessment (RBMCA) approach.
Karmperis AC; Sotirchos A; Aravossis K; Tatsiopoulos IP
Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):194-212. PubMed ID: 21982588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool.
Kim M; Jang YC; Lee S
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():941-8. PubMed ID: 23892135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-criteria decision analysis of management alternatives for anaerobically digested kraft pulp mill sludge.
Eikelboom M; Lopes ADCP; Silva CM; Rodrigues FÁ; Zanuncio AJV; Zanuncio JC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188732. PubMed ID: 29298296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Life cycle assessment of three different management options for spent alkaline batteries.
Xará S; Almeida MF; Costa C
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():460-84. PubMed ID: 26119009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of healthcare waste treatment/disposal alternatives by using multi-criteria decision-making techniques.
Özkan A
Waste Manag Res; 2013 Feb; 31(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 23315364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and selection of decision-making methods to assess landfill mining projects.
Hermann R; Baumgartner RJ; Vorbach S; Ragossnig A; Pomberger R
Waste Manag Res; 2015 Sep; 33(9):822-32. PubMed ID: 26123349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
