These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire. Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ectopic canine control with conventional brackets. Lombardo L Int Orthod; 2012 Dec; 10(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 23158435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photoelastic analysis of stress generated by wires when conventional and self-ligating brackets are used: a pilot study. Sobral GC; Vedovello Filho M; Degan VV; Santamaria M Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 25715719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tip Edge/controlled arch: systematic orthodontics. Part II. Cronin T Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(3):47-9. PubMed ID: 21032995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Non-extraction treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets]. Jiang RP; Fu MK Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):459-63. PubMed ID: 19087583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations. Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Update on the Fujita lingual bracket. Hong RK; Sohn HW J Clin Orthod; 1999 Mar; 33(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 10534993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Fleming PS; Dibiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 19123718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Henao SP; Kusy RP Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]