These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22785041)

  • 1. Cephalometric analysis of dental and skeletal changes following treatment with a passive self-ligating system.
    Ehsani S; Carlyle T; El-Bialy T; Kusnoto B
    J Clin Orthod; 2012 May; 46(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 22785041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
    Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Cho HJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of self-ligating brackets, superelastic wires, expansion/proclination, and permanent retention--a word of caution.
    Zachrisson BU
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 16779979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
    Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Three-dimensional 14 point-cephalometric analysis: compensation of maxillofacial dysmorphisms].
    Faure J; Marshal-Sixou C; Dah-Jouonzo H; Oueiss A; Baron P
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Dec; 79(4):251-61. PubMed ID: 19061629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Chen M; Li ZM; Liu X; Cai B; Wang DW; Feng ZC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Marinho V; Johal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency and distribution of skeletal and dental components in Class II orthognathic surgery patients.
    Lawrence TN; Ellis E; McNamara JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1985 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 3855314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of reverse headgear treatment on sagittal correction in girls born with unilateral complete cleft lip and cleft palate--skeletal and dental changes.
    So LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8638559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental-skeletal dimensions in growing individuals with variations in the lower facial height.
    Enoki C; Telles Cde S; Matsumoto MA
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 15322649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.