These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22786480)

  • 41. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.
    McLernon DJ; Harrild K; Bergh C; Davies MJ; de Neubourg D; Dumoulin JC; Gerris J; Kremer JA; Martikainen H; Mol BW; Norman RJ; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Tiitinen A; van Montfoort AP; van Peperstraten AM; Van Royen E; Bhattacharya S
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6945. PubMed ID: 21177530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.
    Armstrong S; Arroll N; Cree LM; Jordan V; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; (2):CD011320. PubMed ID: 25721906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Abnormal cleavage up to Day 3 does not compromise live birth and neonatal outcomes of embryos that have achieved full blastulation: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lee T; Peirce K; Natalwala J; Chapple V; Mark PJ; Sanders K; Liu Y
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):955-962. PubMed ID: 38553025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Long-acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction.
    Pouwer AW; Farquhar C; Kremer JA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; (6):CD009577. PubMed ID: 22696386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Du M; Guan Y; Wang B; Zhang J; Liu Z
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 May; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 28472983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Oatway C; Gunby J; Daya S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (2):CD004378. PubMed ID: 15106249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review.
    Blake DA; Proctor M; Johnson NP
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):795-807. PubMed ID: 15033948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Neuhausser WM; Vaughan DA; Sakkas D; Hacker MR; Toth T; Penzias A
    Reprod Health; 2020 Jan; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 32000803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 27421614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Embryo transfer impact: a comprehensive national cohort analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes across varied embryo stages in fresh and frozen transfers.
    Chang CT; Weng SF; Chuang HY; Hsu IL; Hsu CY; Tsai EM
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2024; 15():1400255. PubMed ID: 38933826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first frozen cycles of OHSS-risk patients who deferred from fresh embryo transfer.
    Chen H; Lv JQ; Wu XM; Xiao Y; Xi HT; Zhu CF; Huang JY; Zhang F; Ge HS
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015; 31(9):698-701. PubMed ID: 26190533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
    Levi-Setti PE; Cirillo F; Smeraldi A; Morenghi E; Mulazzani GEG; Albani E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 29168022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study.
    Holden EC; Kashani BN; Morelli SS; Alderson D; Jindal SK; Ohman-Strickland PA; McGovern PG
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Jul; 110(1):89-94.e2. PubMed ID: 29908769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies.
    Heymann D; Vidal L; Or Y; Shoham Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Sep; 9(9):CD007421. PubMed ID: 32876946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Day 4 good morula embryo transfer provided compatible live birth rate with day 5 blastocyst embryo in fresh IVF/ET cycles.
    Li RS; Hwu YM; Lee RK; Li SH; Lin MH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29458903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Bontekoe S; Mantikou E; van Wely M; Seshadri S; Repping S; Mastenbroek S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jul; (7):CD008950. PubMed ID: 22786519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alviggi C; Conforti A; Carbone IF; Borrelli R; de Placido G; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 29077229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.
    Healy MW; Yamasaki M; Patounakis G; Richter KS; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27986817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Sfontouris IA; Martins WP; Nastri CO; Viana IG; Navarro PA; Raine-Fenning N; van der Poel S; Rienzi L; Racowsky C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Oct; 33(10):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27491772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Martins WP; Nastri CO; Rienzi L; van der Poel SZ; Gracia CR; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2561-2569. PubMed ID: 27907898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.