These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22788261)
1. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Ratcliffe J; Couzner L; Flynn T; Sawyer M; Stevens K; Brazier J; Burgess L Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21033766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm. Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health-State Values for the Child Health Utility-9D Using Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling. Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Flynn T Health Econ; 2016 Apr; 25(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 25689621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring and valuing health-related quality of life among children and adolescents in mainland China--a pilot study. Xu F; Chen G; Stevens K; Zhou H; Qi S; Wang Z; Hong X; Chen X; Yang H; Wang C; Ratcliffe J PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89222. PubMed ID: 24586607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating a Dutch Value Set for the Pediatric Preference-Based CHU9D Using a Discrete Choice Experiment with Duration. Rowen D; Mulhern B; Stevens K; Vermaire JH Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1234-1242. PubMed ID: 30314625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D Health States with Young Adults: Insights from a Time Trade Off Study. Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Stevens K; Bradley S; Couzner L; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Huynh E; Flynn T Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Oct; 13(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 26135244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument: estimation of a Chinese child and adolescent-specific tariff. Chen G; Xu F; Huynh E; Wang Z; Stevens K; Ratcliffe J Qual Life Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):163-176. PubMed ID: 30374777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The construct validity of the Child Health Utility 9D-DK instrument. Petersen KD; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Serles D; Frøsig CS; Olesen AV Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec; 17(1):187. PubMed ID: 31870369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. Stevens K; Ratcliffe J Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1092-9. PubMed ID: 23244812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the construct validity of the CHU9D in the Australian adolescent general population. Ratcliffe J; Stevens K; Flynn T; Brazier J; Sawyer M Qual Life Res; 2012 May; 21(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 21837445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index. Stevens K Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):729-47. PubMed ID: 22788262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments. Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From KIDSCREEN-10 to CHU9D: creating a unique mapping algorithm for application in economic evaluation. Chen G; Stevens K; Rowen D; Ratcliffe J Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Aug; 12():134. PubMed ID: 25169558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility, Validity and Differences in Adolescent and Adult EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation in Australia and Spain: An Application of Best-Worst Scaling. Dalziel K; Catchpool M; García-Lorenzo B; Gorostiza I; Norman R; Rivero-Arias O Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 May; 38(5):499-513. PubMed ID: 31974830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose values in health? An empirical comparison of the application of adolescent and adult values for the CHU-9D and AQOL-6D in the Australian adolescent general population. Ratcliffe J; Stevens K; Flynn T; Brazier J; Sawyer MG Value Health; 2012; 15(5):730-6. PubMed ID: 22867783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping PedsQL Sweeney R; Chen G; Gold L; Mensah F; Wake M Qual Life Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):639-652. PubMed ID: 31745690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility, reliability and validity of the health-related quality of life instrument Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) among school-aged children and adolescents in Sweden. Lindvall K; Vaezghasemi M; Feldman I; Ivarsson A; Stevens KJ; Petersen S Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Aug; 19(1):193. PubMed ID: 34344386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mapping the PedsQL™ onto the CHU9D: An Assessment of External Validity in a Large Community-Based Sample. Mpundu-Kaambwa C; Chen G; Huynh E; Russo R; Ratcliffe J Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1139-1153. PubMed ID: 31161585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]