BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

645 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22788795)

  • 1. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
    Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up.
    Heering M; Berg KD; Brasso K; Iversen P; Røder MA
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28317581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wrong to be Right: Margin Laterality is an Independent Predictor of Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kang JJ; Reiter RE; Kummer N; DeKernion J; Steinberg ML; King CR
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26237192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Amling C; Freedland SJ
    BJU Int; 2016 Feb; 117(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 26010160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between pre-operative PSA and prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with long-term follow-up after radical prostatectomy.
    Lewinshtein D; Teng B; Valencia A; Gibbons R; Porter CR
    Prostate; 2012 Jan; 72(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21520159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term radical prostatectomy outcomes among participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam.
    Loeb S; Zhu X; Schroder FH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1678-83. PubMed ID: 22998182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
    BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
    Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.