192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22789013)
1. Practice of primary elective cesarean upon maternal request in the commonwealth of virginia.
Alnaif B; Beydoun H
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012; 41(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 22789013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.
Glavind J; Uldbjerg N
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 25689238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do pregnant women prefer timing of elective cesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks of gestation? Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial.
Glavind J; Henriksen TB; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1782-6. PubMed ID: 24397308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
Glavind J; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N; Khalil M; Møller AM; Mortensen BB; Rasmussen OB; Christensen JT; Jørgensen JS; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2013 Aug; 120(9):1123-32. PubMed ID: 23682628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.
Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery.
Miesnik SR; Reale BJ
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2007; 36(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 17973706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A qualitative approach to examine women's experience of planned cesarean.
Blüml V; Stammler-Safar M; Reitinger AK; Resch I; Naderer A; Leithner K
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012; 41(6):E82-90. PubMed ID: 22861149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early elective delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean in rural US maternity hospitals.
Heinrich D; Vogel RI; Kozhimannil KB
Rural Remote Health; 2016; 16(4):3956. PubMed ID: 27846361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in Hospital Intrapartum Practices and Association With Cesarean Rate.
Lundsberg LS; Illuzzi JL; Gariepy AM; Sheth SS; Pettker CM; Lee HC; Lipkind HS; Xu X
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 27886948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [What should we tell our patient who requires cesarean section?].
Weiner Z
Harefuah; 2014 Jun; 153(6):327-8, 367. PubMed ID: 25095604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence and determinants of neonatal morbidity after elective caesarean section at the national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda.
Nakimuli A; Nakubulwa S; Kakaire O; Osinde MO; Mbalinda SN; Nabirye RC; Kakande N; Kaye DK
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():624. PubMed ID: 26518174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation.
Ertuğrul S; Gün I; Müngen E; Muhçu M; Kılıç S; Atay V
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 22889289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antepartum management protocol. Timing and mode of delivery in gestational diabetes.
Hod M; Bar J; Peled Y; Fried S; Katz I; Itzhak M; Ashkenazi S; Schindel B; Ben-Rafael Z
Diabetes Care; 1998 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():B113-7. PubMed ID: 9704237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Elective cesarean section on maternal request--what's new?].
Rabinerson D; Aviram A; Gabbay-Benziv R
Harefuah; 2014 Jun; 153(6):329-33, 367. PubMed ID: 25095605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion.
Cotzias CS; Paterson-Brown S; Fisk NM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Jul; 97(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11435000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
