These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22789013)

  • 41. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Minkoff H; Powderly KR; Chervenak F; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 14754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Risk factors analysis for elective caesarean section in Campania region (Italy)].
    Giani U; Bruzzese D; Pugliese A; Saporito M; Triassi M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 21628753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The association between obstetrical interventions and late preterm birth.
    Bassil KL; Yasseen AS; Walker M; Sgro MD; Shah PS; Smith GN; Campbell DM; Mamdani M; Sprague AE; Lee SK; Maguire JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 210(6):538.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24582931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Jun; 42(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 26002173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Survey of Obstetric Care and Cesarean Delivery Rates in Shanghai, China.
    Hellerstein S; Feldman S; Duan T
    Birth; 2016 Sep; 43(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 26991900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990.
    Taffel SM
    Vital Health Stat 21 Data Natal Marriage Divorce; 1994 May; (51):1-24. PubMed ID: 8049307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761 Summary: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 133(1):226-227. PubMed ID: 30575671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The philosophy of practice governs the rate of obstetric intervention: analysis of 212 units in the United Kingdom.
    O'Connell MP; Gurney EM; Lindow SW
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 12854929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L; Leeman R
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.
    Wu JM; Hundley AF; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 15684156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Extremely preterm cesarean delivery: a clinical study.
    Högberg U; Håkansson S; Serenius F; Holmgren PA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1442-7. PubMed ID: 17260219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Gregory KD; Korst LM; Gornbein JA; Platt LD
    Health Serv Res; 2002 Oct; 37(5):1387-401. PubMed ID: 12479502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What is underneath the cesarean request?
    Dweik D; Sluijs AM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1153-5. PubMed ID: 26073197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.
    Hueston WJ; Applegate JA; Mansfield CJ; King DE; McClaflin RR
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Apr; 40(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 7699347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Should women be able to choose caesarean delivery? A survey of UK obstetric anaesthetists.
    Patel NB; Plaat F
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2014 Feb; 23(1):90-1. PubMed ID: 24268945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The perinatal quality collaborative of North Carolina's 39 weeks project: a quality improvement program to decrease elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation.
    Berrien K; Devente J; French A; Cochran KM; McCaffrey M; Horton BJ; Chescheir N
    N C Med J; 2014; 75(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 24830487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Maternal and fetal outcome in elective versus emergency cesarean section.
    Suwal A; Shrivastava VR; Giri A
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2013; 52(192):563-6. PubMed ID: 25327227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.