These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22789667)
1. Women's perception of antenatal care services in public and private clinics in the Gambia. Jallow IK; Chou YJ; Liu TL; Huang N Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Dec; 24(6):595-600. PubMed ID: 22789667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnant women's satisfaction with the quality of antenatal care and the continued willingness to use health facility care in Lusaka district, Zambia. Hibusu L; Sumankuuro J; Gwelo NB; Akintola O BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Jan; 24(1):20. PubMed ID: 38166783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in essential newborn care at birth between private and public health facilities in eastern Uganda. Waiswa P; Akuze J; Peterson S; Kerber K; Tetui M; Forsberg BC; Hanson C Glob Health Action; 2015; 8():24251. PubMed ID: 25843495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antenatal care in The Gambia: missed opportunity for information, education and communication. Anya SE; Hydara A; Jaiteh LE BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Mar; 8():9. PubMed ID: 18325122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's satisfaction with the quality of antenatal care services rendered at public health facilities in Northwest Ethiopia: the application of partial proportional odds model. Emiru AA; Alene GD; Debelew GT BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e037085. PubMed ID: 32948558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China. Chen L; Dai Y; Zhang Y; Wu Q; Rudan D; Saftić V; van Velthoven MH; Su J; Tan Z; Scherpbier RW Croat Med J; 2013 Apr; 54(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 23630142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and perceived quality of care for maternal, neonatal and antenatal care in Kenya and Namibia: the service provision assessment. Diamond-Smith N; Sudhinaraset M; Montagu D Reprod Health; 2016 Aug; 13(1):92. PubMed ID: 27515487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determinants of pregnant women's satisfaction with interactions with health providers at antenatal consultation in primary health care in Southern Mozambique in 2021: a cross-sectional study. Dulá J; Chicumbe S; Martins MDRO BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb; 24(1):165. PubMed ID: 38408915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of patient perceived primary care quality in public clinics, public hospitals and private clinics in rural China. Wang W; Maitland E; Nicholas S; Loban E; Haggerty J Int J Equity Health; 2017 Oct; 16(1):176. PubMed ID: 28974255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "They told me to come back": women's antenatal care booking experience in inner-city Johannesburg. Solarin I; Black V Matern Child Health J; 2013 Feb; 17(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 22527767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Out-of-pocket expenses for maternity care in rural Bangladesh: a public-private comparison. Rahman M; Rob U; Noor FR; Bellows B Int Q Community Health Educ; 2012-2013; 33(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 23661416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of a new antenatal care programme on the attitudes of pregnant women and midwives towards antenatal care in Harare. Murira N; Munjanja SP; Zhanda I; Nystrom L; Lindmark G Cent Afr J Med; 1997 May; 43(5):131-5. PubMed ID: 9505452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and comparison of antenatal care in public and private providers in the United Republic of Tanzania. Boller C; Wyss K; Mtasiwa D; Tanner M Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 12751419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'They Forget I'm Deaf': Exploring the Experience and Perception of Deaf Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics/Care. Adigun OT; Mngomezulu TP Ann Glob Health; 2020 Aug; 86(1):96. PubMed ID: 32832389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prenatal care in public and private health services: a population-based survey in Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil]. Cesar JA; Sutil AT; Santos GB; Cunha CF; Mendoza-Sassi RA Cad Saude Publica; 2012 Nov; 28(11):2106-14. PubMed ID: 23147952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's views and experiences of antenatal care in Iraq: a Q methodology study. Shabila NP; Ahmed HM; Yasin MY BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jan; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24450437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do health care providers give sufficient information and good counseling during ante-natal care in Lao PDR?: an observational study. Phommachanh S; Essink DR; Wright EP; Broerse JEW; Mayxay M BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jul; 19(1):449. PubMed ID: 31272432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality differentials and reproductive health service utilisation determinants in India. Anand S; Sinha RK Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2010; 23(8):718-29. PubMed ID: 21125967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of maternal and newborn health services costs in Sindh Pakistan. Khowaja AR; Mitton C; Qureshi R; Bryan S; Magee LA; von Dadelszen P; Bhutta ZA PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208299. PubMed ID: 30521575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantity and quality of information, education and communication during antenatal visit at private and public sector hospitals of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Mahar B; Kumar R; Rizvi N; Bahalkani HA; Haq M; Soomro J J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(3-4):71-4. PubMed ID: 24669615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]