145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22791082)
1. Quantitative performance of advanced resolution recovery strategies on SPECT images: evaluation with use of digital phantom models.
Onishi H; Motomura N; Fujino K; Natsume T; Haramoto Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jan; 6(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 22791082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with attenuation correction, scatter correction and resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT.
Okuda K; Nakajima K; Yamada M; Wakabayashi H; Ichikawa H; Arai H; Matsuo S; Taki J; Hashimoto M; Kinuya S
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 28(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 24214735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Resolution Recovery in Quantitative
Ismail FS; Mansor S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Sep; 50(3):449-453. PubMed ID: 31320272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of resolution recovery by using collimator detector response during 3D OSEM image reconstruction on (99m)Tc-ECD brain SPET images.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Ay MR; Razavi-Ratki SK; Fard-Esfahani A; Beiki D; Eftekhari M; Fallahi B; Sadeghian L; Emami-Ardekani A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 22741145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of ordered-subsets expectation maximization with 3D post-reconstruction Gauss filtering and comparison with filtered backprojection in 99mTc SPECT.
Brambilla M; Cannillo B; Dominietto M; Leva L; Secco C; Inglese E
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 19(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of OSEM reconstruction algorithm incorporating three-dimensional distance-dependent resolution compensation for brain SPECT: a simulation study.
Yokoi T; Shinohara H; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2002 Feb; 16(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11922203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification and reduction of the collimator-detector response effect in SPECT by applying a system model during iterative image reconstruction: a simulation study.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Saghari M
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Mar; 33(3):228-38. PubMed ID: 22134173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of 3DOSEM and MAP algorithms for reconstructing low count SPECT acquisitions.
Grootjans W; Meeuwis AP; Slump CH; de Geus-Oei LF; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):311-322. PubMed ID: 26725165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive Autoregressive Model for Reduction of Noise in SPECT.
Takalo R; Hytti H; Ihalainen H; Sohlberg A
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():494691. PubMed ID: 26089966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Texture analysis for automated evaluation of Jaszczak phantom SPECT system tests.
Nichols KJ; DiFilippo FP; Palestro CJ
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 30418674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction "half-time" gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to "full-time" filtered backprojection.
DePuey EG; Gadiraju R; Clark J; Thompson L; Anstett F; Shwartz SC
J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(4):547-63. PubMed ID: 18674723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the Number of Sampling Angles in Three Dimensional Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization: Comparison of Step and Shoot Acquisition and Continuous Acquisition].
Awamoto E; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Tsutsui Y; Noguchi Y; Komiya I
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 32435033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, scatter and attenuation correction in ¹²³I-FP-CIT SPECT.
Matsutomo N; Nagaki A; Yamao F; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 29(7):636-42. PubMed ID: 25997807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction for single-photon emission computed tomography from undersampled projection data: a simulation study in 123I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane imaging.
Matsutomo N; Fukaya K; Hashimoto T; Yamamoto T; Sato E
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Feb; 40(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 30362988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3-dimensional mathematic cylinder phantom for the evaluation of the fundamental performance of SPECT.
Onishi H; Motomura N; Takahashi M; Yanagisawa M; Ogawa K
J Nucl Med Technol; 2010 Mar; 38(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20159932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of Post-reconstruction Filtering in Resolution Recovery Reconstruction for Bone SPECT Imaging].
Nakashima M; Kangai Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(10):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 33087648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of commercial resolution recovery techniques in four state-of-the-art single photon emission computed tomography systems using a digital phantom model].
Onishi H; Motomura N; Fujino K; Natsume T; Haramoto Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 22805445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pediatric 99mTc-DMSA SPECT performed by using iterative reconstruction with isotropic resolution recovery: improved image quality and reduced radiopharmaceutical activity.
Sheehy N; Tetrault TA; Zurakowski D; Vija AH; Fahey FH; Treves ST
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 19304919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT.
Knoll P; Kotalova D; Köchle G; Kuzelka I; Minear G; Mirzaei S; Sámal M; Zadrazil L; Bergmann H
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21723716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
