294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22791786)
1. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics.
Jeevan R; Cromwell DA; Trivella M; Lawrence G; Kearins O; Pereira J; Sheppard C; Caddy CM; van der Meulen JH
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4505. PubMed ID: 22791786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: A single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases.
Kryh CG; Pietersen CA; Rahr HB; Christensen RD; Wamberg P; Lautrup MD
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):784-9. PubMed ID: 25227964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer death after non-screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ from 1990 to 2018 in England: population based cohort study.
Mannu GS; Wang Z; Dodwell D; Broggio J; Charman J; Darby SC
BMJ; 2024 Jan; 384():e075498. PubMed ID: 38267073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates.
Jeevan R; Mennie JC; Mohanna PN; O'Donoghue JM; Rainsbury RM; Cromwell DA
Br J Surg; 2016 Aug; 103(9):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27324317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals.
Talsma AK; Reedijk AM; Damhuis RA; Westenend PJ; Vles WJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 21292434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Hennigs A; Fuchs V; Sinn HP; Riedel F; Rauch G; Smetanay K; Golatta M; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Schneeweiss A; Sohn C; Heil J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):1831-7. PubMed ID: 26732272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunities to reduce reoperations and to improve inter-facility profiling after initial breast-conserving surgery for cancer. A report from the NCDB.
Landercasper J; Bennie B; Ahmad HF; Linebarger JH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2026-2036. PubMed ID: 31383386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?
Walsh SM; Brennan SB; Zabor EC; Rosenberger LH; Stempel M; Lebron-Zapata L; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4246-4253. PubMed ID: 31396783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Second operation more frequent following breast-conserving treatment for invasive lobular than for invasive non-lobular carcinoma].
de Zeeuw S; Wildenberg F; Strobbe L; Wobbes T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A56. PubMed ID: 19900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: Comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL).
Niinikoski L; Hukkinen K; Leidenius MHK; Vaara P; Voynov A; Heikkilä P; Mattson J; Meretoja TJ
Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():93-101. PubMed ID: 31362135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
