These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22793167)

  • 1. Biomechanical aspects of preoperative planning of skull correction in children with craniosynostosis.
    Larysz D; Wolański W; Kawlewska E; Mandera M; Gzik M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2012; 14(2):19-26. PubMed ID: 22793167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling and biomechanical analysis of craniosynostosis correction with the use of finite element method.
    Wolański W; Larysz D; Gzik M; Kawlewska E
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Sep; 29(9):916-25. PubMed ID: 23349146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological analysis of the skull shape in craniosynostosis.
    Tejszerska D; Wolański W; Larysz D; Gzik M; Sacha E
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21500762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniosynostosis.
    Foltz EL; Loeser JD
    J Neurosurg; 1975 Jul; 43(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 1141983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expanding cranioplasty for craniosynostosis and allied disorders.
    Mori K; Sakamoto T; Nakai K
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1992 Oct; 8(7):399-405. PubMed ID: 1458498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Augmented reality and physical hybrid model simulation for preoperative planning of metopic craniosynostosis surgery.
    Coelho G; Rabelo NN; Vieira E; Mendes K; Zagatto G; Santos de Oliveira R; Raposo-Amaral CE; Yoshida M; de Souza MR; Fagundes CF; Teixeira MJ; Figueiredo EG
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Mar; 48(3):E19. PubMed ID: 32114555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are routine preoperative CT scans necessary in the management of single suture craniosynostosis?
    Cerovac S; Neil-Dwyer JG; Rich P; Jones BM; Hayward RD
    Br J Neurosurg; 2002 Aug; 16(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 12389887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of skull models and surgical simulation: comparison of outcome between different surgical techniques in patients with isolated brachycephaly.
    Emmez H; Küçüködük I; Börcek AO; Kale A; Seçen E; Erbaş G; Yavuzer R; Baykaner MK
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1605-12. PubMed ID: 19575208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-invariant image registration method for quantification of surgical outcomes in patients with craniosynostosis: a preliminary study.
    de Oliveira ME; Hallila H; Ritvanen A; Büchler P; Paulasto M; Hukki J
    J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Oct; 46(10):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22008355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of craniosynostosis.
    Panchal J; Uttchin V
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):2032-48; quiz 2049. PubMed ID: 12711969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiometric study of postoperative development of skull shape and cranial volume in children with craniosynostoses].
    Kovács A; Marquardt G
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 1999; 60(3):125-32. PubMed ID: 10726335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cranial shape comparison for automated objective 3D craniosynostosis surgery planning.
    Tolhuisen ML; de Jong GA; van Damme RJM; van der Heijden F; Delye HHK
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3349. PubMed ID: 29463840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of Head Shape from Three-Dimensional Photography for Presurgical and Postsurgical Evaluation of Craniosynostosis.
    Porras AR; Tu L; Tsering D; Mantilla E; Oh A; Enquobahrie A; Keating R; Rogers GF; Linguraru MG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):1051e-1060e. PubMed ID: 31764657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Congenital malformations of the skull and meninges.
    Kanev PM
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2007 Feb; 40(1):9-26, v. PubMed ID: 17346559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of an in-silico modelling platform for outcome prediction in spring assisted posterior vault expansion.
    Deliège L; Misier KR; Bozkurt S; Breakey W; James G; Ong J; Dunaway D; Jeelani NUO; Schievano S; Borghi A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Aug; 88():105424. PubMed ID: 34303069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary craniofacial management following initial correction of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.
    Shin JH; Sun P; Persing JA
    Clin Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 24(3):415-28. PubMed ID: 9246510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polyurethane Foam-Filled Skull Replica of Craniosynostosis for Surgical Training.
    Jeong YJ; Lee JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):e291-2. PubMed ID: 27054421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereolithographic skull models in the surgical planning of fronto-supraorbital bar advancement for non-syndromic trigonocephaly.
    van Nunen DP; Janssen LE; Stubenitsky BM; Han KS; Muradin MS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):959-65. PubMed ID: 24530077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The State of Technology in Craniosynostosis.
    Safran T; Viezel-Mathieu A; Beland B; Azzi AJ; Galli R; Gilardino M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):904-907. PubMed ID: 29498975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniosynostosis.
    Kabbani H; Raghuveer TS
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Jun; 69(12):2863-70. PubMed ID: 15222651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.