These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Fractions We Cannot Ignore: The Nonsymbolic Ratio Congruity Effect. Matthews PG; Lewis MR Cogn Sci; 2017 Aug; 41(6):1656-1674. PubMed ID: 27766661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Count me in! On the automaticity of numerosity processing. Naparstek S; Henik A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 20565221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners. Sasanguie D; Defever E; Maertens B; Reynvoet B Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 23767979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laterality briefed: laterality modulates performance in a numerosity-congruity task. Naparstek S; Henik A Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):444-50. PubMed ID: 22227271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rational numbers: componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task. Meert G; Grégoire J; Noël MP Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1598-616. PubMed ID: 19123119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Symbolic, Nonsymbolic and Conceptual: An Across-Notation Study on the Space Mapping of Numerals. Zhang Y; You X; Zhu R Perception; 2016 Jul; 45(7):787-804. PubMed ID: 27013480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuous visual properties of number influence the formation of novel symbolic representations. Merkley R; Scerif G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1860-70. PubMed ID: 25622722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Symbolic fractions elicit an analog magnitude representation in school-age children. Kalra PB; Binzak JV; Matthews PG; Hubbard EM J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jul; 195():104844. PubMed ID: 32244000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Mussolin C; Mejias S; Noël MP Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 20149355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Numerosity processing is context driven even in the subitizing range: An fMRI study. Leibovich T; Henik A; Salti M Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():137-47. PubMed ID: 26297625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical magnitude in the human parietal lobe; tests of representational generality and domain specificity. Shuman M; Kanwisher N Neuron; 2004 Oct; 44(3):557-69. PubMed ID: 15504334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Judgement of discrete and continuous quantity in adults: number counts! Nys J; Content A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):675-90. PubMed ID: 22054280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mental Numerosity Line in the Human's Approximate Number System. Zhou X; Shen C; Li L; Li D; Cui J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 63(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 27404985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]