These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22794209)

  • 1. Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study.
    Ehrhardt IC; Zuolo ML; Cunha RS; De Martin AS; Kherlakian D; Carvalho MC; Bueno CE
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1078-81. PubMed ID: 22794209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
    Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.
    Schmitz Mda S; Santos R; Capelli A; Jacobovitz M; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18949299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.
    Vanni JR; Santos R; Limongi O; Guerisoli DM; Capelli A; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16429181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination in maxillary lateral incisors.
    Ibelli GS; Barroso JM; Capelli A; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 17982547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of cervical preflaring of root canal on determination of initial apical file using Gates Glidden drills, Protaper, Race and diamond-coated Galaxy files.
    Ashwini TS; Bhandari S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 23151709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
    Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
    J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
    Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the separation incidence of reciprocating WaveOne files: a prospective clinical study.
    Cunha RS; Junaid A; Ensinas P; Nudera W; Bueno CE
    J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):922-4. PubMed ID: 24935536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.
    Marfisi K; Mercade M; Plotino G; Duran-Sindreu F; Bueno R; Roig M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 20726911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of self-adjusting file, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the root canal wall.
    Hin ES; Wu MK; Wesselink PR; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 23321242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
    Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals.
    Mollo A; Botti G; Prinicipi Goldoni N; Randellini E; Paragliola R; Chazine M; Ounsi HF; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21848894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study.
    Iqbal MK; Kohli MR; Kim JS
    J Endod; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1048-52. PubMed ID: 17055904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars.
    Dietrich MA; Kirkpatrick TC; Yaccino JM
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1140-4. PubMed ID: 22794223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.