These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22794221)

  • 1. The reliability of artificial neural network in locating minor apical foramen: a cadaver study.
    Saghiri MA; Garcia-Godoy F; Gutmann JL; Lotfi M; Asgar K
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1130-4. PubMed ID: 22794221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new approach for locating the minor apical foramen using an artificial neural network.
    Saghiri MA; Asgar K; Boukani KK; Lotfi M; Aghili H; Delvarani A; Karamifar K; Saghiri AM; Mehrvarzfar P; Garcia-Godoy F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 22007705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of electronic working length determination.
    Hoer D; Attin T
    Int Endod J; 2004 Feb; 37(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 14871179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators.
    Vieyra JP; Acosta J; Mondaca JM
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jan; 43(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 20002800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction.
    Williams CB; Joyce AP; Roberts S
    J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):624-7. PubMed ID: 16793467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.
    Somma F; Castagnola R; Lajolo C; Paternò Holtzman L; Marigo L
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 22257341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: an attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal.
    Hassanien EE; Hashem A; Chalfin H
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 18358885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
    Liang YH; Jiang L; Chen C; Gao XJ; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators compared with digital radiography: an ex vivo study.
    Cianconi L; Angotti V; Felici R; Conte G; Mancini M
    J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):2003-7. PubMed ID: 21092822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.
    Kishor KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 23151708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kara Tuncer A; Gerek M
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 24331988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Root ZX II in locating foramen in teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study.
    Piasecki L; Carneiro E; Fariniuk LF; Westphalen VP; Fiorentin MA; da Silva Neto UX
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1213-6. PubMed ID: 21846536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars.
    Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of an apex locator on exposure to radiation during endodontic therapy.
    Brunton PA; Abdeen D; MacFarlane TV
    J Endod; 2002 Jul; 28(7):524-6. PubMed ID: 12126381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
    Wankhade AD; Kumar R; Singh RK; Chandra A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(2):E38-42. PubMed ID: 23635968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
    Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.