BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22795459)

  • 1. Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation?
    Kirklin JK; Naftel DC; Pagani FD; Kormos RL; Stevenson L; Miller M; Young JB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Sep; 144(3):584-603; discussion 597-8. PubMed ID: 22795459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.
    Kormos RL; Cowger J; Pagani FD; Teuteberg JJ; Goldstein DJ; Jacobs JP; Higgins RS; Stevenson LW; Stehlik J; Atluri P; Grady KL; Kirklin JK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2019 Feb; 38(2):114-126. PubMed ID: 30691593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.
    Kormos RL; Cowger J; Pagani FD; Teuteberg JJ; Goldstein DJ; Jacobs JP; Higgins RS; Stevenson LW; Stehlik J; Atluri P; Grady KL; Kirklin JK
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):341-353. PubMed ID: 30691584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
    Kamdar F; John R; Eckman P; Colvin-Adams M; Shumway SJ; Liao K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 145(2):575-81. PubMed ID: 23321132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.
    Holman WL; Naftel DC; Eckert CE; Kormos RL; Goldstein DJ; Kirklin JK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 146(2):437-41.e1. PubMed ID: 23490245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bridge to transplant experience: factors influencing survival to and after cardiac transplant.
    Smedira NG; Hoercher KJ; Yoon DY; Rajeswaran J; Klingman L; Starling RC; Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1295-305, 1305.e1-4. PubMed ID: 20412961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation: a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).
    Starling RC; Naka Y; Boyle AJ; Gonzalez-Stawinski G; John R; Jorde U; Russell SD; Conte JV; Aaronson KD; McGee EC; Cotts WG; DeNofrio D; Pham DT; Farrar DJ; Pagani FD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 May; 57(19):1890-8. PubMed ID: 21545946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).
    Jorde UP; Kushwaha SS; Tatooles AJ; Naka Y; Bhat G; Long JW; Horstmanshof DA; Kormos RL; Teuteberg JJ; Slaughter MS; Birks EJ; Farrar DJ; Park SJ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 May; 63(17):1751-7. PubMed ID: 24613333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of death and transplant in patients with a mechanical circulatory support device: a multi-institutional study.
    Holman WL; Kormos RL; Naftel DC; Miller MA; Pagani FD; Blume E; Cleeton T; Koenig SC; Edwards L; Kirklin JK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Jan; 28(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19134530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences.
    Stulak JM; Davis ME; Haglund N; Dunlay S; Cowger J; Shah P; Pagani FD; Aaronson KD; Maltais S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jan; 151(1):177-89. PubMed ID: 26545967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
    John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.
    Enriquez AD; Calenda B; Miller MA; Anyanwu AC; Pinney SP
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 6(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 23873139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Patients Supported With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Have a Sufficient Risk of Death to Justify a Priority Allocation? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Patients Listed in UNOS Status 2.
    Mastrobuoni S; Dell'Aquila AM; Van Caenegem O; Poncelet A; Jacquet LM; Garcia J
    Transplantation; 2018 Jun; 102(6):e288-e294. PubMed ID: 29346259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?
    Sabashnikov A; Popov AF; Bowles CT; Mohite PN; Weymann A; Hards R; Hedger M; Wittwer T; Wippermann J; Wahlers T; Schoendube FA; Simon AR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):1115-21; discussion 1021-2. PubMed ID: 25129605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical circulatory support devices in advanced heart failure: 2020 and beyond.
    Vieira JL; Ventura HO; Mehra MR
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2020; 63(5):630-639. PubMed ID: 32971112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of contemporary mechanical circulatory support device configurations in patients with severe biventricular failure.
    Levin AP; Jaramillo N; Garan AR; Takeda K; Takayama H; Yuzefpolskaya M; Mancini DM; Naka Y; Colombo PC; Topkara VK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 151(2):530-5.e2. PubMed ID: 26651960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Implications of Respiratory Failure in Patients Receiving Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure.
    Miller PE; Caraballo C; Ravindra NG; Mezzacappa C; McCullough M; Gruen J; Levin A; Reinhardt S; Ali A; Desai NR; Ahmad T
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006369. PubMed ID: 31707800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of concurrent surgical valve procedures in patients receiving continuous-flow devices.
    John R; Naka Y; Park SJ; Sai-Sudhakar C; Salerno C; Sundareswaran KS; Farrar DJ; Milano CA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):581-9; discussion 589. PubMed ID: 24418362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.
    Kiernan MS; Grandin EW; Brinkley M; Kapur NK; Pham DT; Ruthazer R; Rame JE; Atluri P; Birati EY; Oliveira GH; Pagani FD; Kirklin JK; Naftel D; Kormos RL; Teuteberg JJ; DeNofrio D
    Circ Heart Fail; 2017 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 29021348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency of Poor Outcome (Death or Poor Quality of Life) After Left Ventricular Assist Device for Destination Therapy: Results From the INTERMACS Registry.
    Arnold SV; Jones PG; Allen LA; Cohen DJ; Fendler TJ; Holtz JE; Aggarwal S; Spertus JA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27507111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.