181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22796307)
21. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old.
Cotter SA; Chu RH; Chandler DL; Beck RW; Holmes JM; Rice ML; Hertle RW; Birch EE; Moke PS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 14516805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis).
Kaiser PK
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2009 Dec; 107():311-24. PubMed ID: 20126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Repeatability and Agreement of Visual Acuity Using the ETDRS Number Chart, Landolt C Chart, or ETDRS Alphabet Chart in Eyes With or Without Sight-Threatening Diseases.
Chaikitmongkol V; Nanegrungsunk O; Patikulsila D; Ruamviboonsuk P; Bressler NM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 136(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 29346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.
Miwa M; Iwanami M; Oba MS; Mizuki N; Nishida T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 251(12):2761-7. PubMed ID: 24057176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.
Sanker N; Dhirani S; Bhakat P
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 24339687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Repeatability of ETDRS visual acuity in children.
Manny RE; Hussein M; Gwiazda J; Marsh-Tootle W;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 44(8):3294-300. PubMed ID: 12882773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses.
Tong L; Saw SM; Chan ES; Yap M; Lee HY; Kwang YP; Tan D
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):684-91. PubMed ID: 15365388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the visual acuity iPad app Eye Chart Pro compared to the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart in a low-vision population.
Hazari H; Curtis R; Eden K; Hopman WM; Irrcher I; Bona MD
J Telemed Telecare; 2022 Oct; 28(9):680-686. PubMed ID: 32985378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the "compact reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart in amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Abbott A; Rosser DA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 87(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 14507755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Distance and near visual acuity in infantile nystagmus.
Hanson KS; Bedell HE; White JM; Ukwade MT
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):823-9. PubMed ID: 17106409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology.
Siktberg J; Hamdan S; Liu Y; Chen Q; Donahue SP; Patel SN; Sternberg P; Robinson J; Kammer JA; Gangaputra SS
Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Mar; 1(1):100007. PubMed ID: 36246005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.
Chen SI; Chandna A; Norcia AM; Pettet M; Stone D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):614-9. PubMed ID: 16431958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a Home-Printable Vision Screening Test for Telemedicine.
Crossland MD; Dekker TM; Hancox J; Lisi M; Wemyss TA; Thomas PBM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 139(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 33410910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Visual Acuity Measurement Using Three Methods: Standard ETDRS Chart, Near Chart and a Smartphone-Based Eye Chart Application.
Tiraset N; Poonyathalang A; Padungkiatsagul T; Deeyai M; Vichitkunakorn P; Vanikieti K
Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():859-869. PubMed ID: 33664563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
