These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22796472)

  • 1. Investigation of a novel algorithm for synchronized left-ventricular pacing and ambulatory optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the adaptive CRT trial.
    Martin DO; Lemke B; Birnie D; Krum H; Lee KL; Aonuma K; Gasparini M; Starling RC; Milasinovic G; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Gorcsan J; Houmsse M;
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1807-14. PubMed ID: 22796472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel algorithm for individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale and design of the adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy trial.
    Krum H; Lemke B; Birnie D; Lee KL; Aonuma K; Starling RC; Gasparini M; Gorcsan J; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Kalmes A; Martin D
    Am Heart J; 2012 May; 163(5):747-752.e1. PubMed ID: 22607850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes with synchronized left ventricular pacing: analysis of the adaptive CRT trial.
    Birnie D; Lemke B; Aonuma K; Krum H; Lee KL; Gasparini M; Starling RC; Milasinovic G; Gorcsan J; Houmsse M; Abeyratne A; Sambelashvili A; Martin DO
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Sep; 10(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 23851059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical response with adaptive CRT algorithm compared with CRT with echocardiography-optimized atrioventricular delay: a retrospective analysis of multicentre trials.
    Singh JP; Abraham WT; Chung ES; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Coles JA; Martin DO
    Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1622-8. PubMed ID: 24014804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and results of aCRT MID-Q study: Adoption of adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and moderately wide left bundle branch block.
    Yamasaki H; Sekiguchi Y; Gosho M; Nogami A; Aonuma K;
    J Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 75(3):330-336. PubMed ID: 31492516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Left ventricular-only pacing in heart failure patients with normal atrioventricular conduction improves global function and left ventricular regional mechanics compared with biventricular pacing: an adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy sub-study.
    Burns KV; Gage RM; Curtin AE; Gorcsan J; Bank AJ
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1335-1343. PubMed ID: 28653458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: Results of the Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial.
    Birnie D; Hudnall H; Lemke B; Aonuma K; Lee KL; Gasparini M; Gorcsan J; Cerkvenik J; Martin DO
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Dec; 14(12):1820-1825. PubMed ID: 28893549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with decreased risk of incident atrial fibrillation compared to standard biventricular pacing: A real-world analysis of 37,450 patients followed by remote monitoring.
    Hsu JC; Birnie D; Stadler RW; Cerkvenik J; Feld GK; Birgersdotter-Green U
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Jul; 16(7):983-989. PubMed ID: 31102750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(13):1-60. PubMed ID: 23074464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of automatic frequent pace-timing adjustments on effective left ventricular pacing during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Varma N; Stadler RW; Ghosh S; Kloppe A
    Europace; 2017 May; 19(5):831-837. PubMed ID: 27230561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial.
    Boriani G; Kranig W; Donal E; Calo L; Casella M; Delarche N; Lozano IF; Ansalone G; Biffi M; Boulogne E; Leclercq C;
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jun; 159(6):1052-1058.e1. PubMed ID: 20569719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel Device-Based Algorithm Provides Optimal Hemodynamics During Exercise in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Kasagawa A; Nakajima I; Izumo M; Nakayama Y; Yamada M; Takano M; Matsuda H; Furukawa T; Miyazaki H; Harada T; Akashi YJ
    Circ J; 2019 Sep; 83(10):2002-2009. PubMed ID: 31462585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuously adjusting CRT therapy: clinical impact of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Houmsse M; Abraham WT
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2014 May; 12(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 24678730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-world behavior of CRT pacing using the AdaptivCRT algorithm on patient outcomes: Effect on mortality and atrial fibrillation incidence.
    Singh JP; Cha YM; Lunati M; Chung ES; Li S; Smeets P; O'Donnell D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):825-833. PubMed ID: 32009263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and left bundle branch block: Does QRS duration matter?
    Yamasaki H; Lustgarten D; Cerkvenik J; Birnie D; Gasparini M; Lee KL; Sekiguchi Y; Varma N; Lemke B; Starling RC; Aonuma K
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 240():297-301. PubMed ID: 28416247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of a Novel Adaptive Optimization Algorithm on 30-Day Readmissions: Evidence From the Adaptive CRT Trial.
    Starling RC; Krum H; Bril S; Tsintzos SI; Rogers T; Hudnall JH; Martin DO
    JACC Heart Fail; 2015 Jul; 3(7):565-572. PubMed ID: 26071616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The association between biventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator efficacy when compared with implantable cardioverter defibrillator on outcomes and reverse remodelling.
    Ruwald AC; Kutyifa V; Ruwald MH; Solomon S; Daubert JP; Jons C; Brenyo A; McNitt S; Do D; Tanabe K; Al-Ahmad A; Wang P; Moss AJ; Zareba W
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Feb; 36(7):440-8. PubMed ID: 25112662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Automated Dynamic Optimization and Left Ventricular-only Pacing.
    Gwag HB; Park Y; Lee SS; Kim JS; Park KM; On YK; Park SJ
    J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 34(27):e187. PubMed ID: 31293111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure.
    Rogers DP; Lambiase PD; Lowe MD; Chow AW
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2012 May; 14(5):495-505. PubMed ID: 22312038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
    Wilkoff BL;
    Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.