These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22797013)

  • 1. The Cradle Coast personally controlled electronic health record evaluation research.
    Cummings E; Cheek C; Van Der Ploeg W; Orpin P; Behrens H; Condon S; Jaffray L; Ellis I; Ringeisen Arnold B; Brogan R; Skinner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():14-9. PubMed ID: 22797013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.
    Lehnbom EC; McLachlan A; Brien JA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():105-10. PubMed ID: 22797027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.
    Almond H; Cummings E; Turner P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():1-6. PubMed ID: 23823280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.
    Kerai P; Wood P; Martin M
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 24382474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current patient and healthcare worker attitudes to eHealth and the personally controlled electronic health record in major hospitals.
    Armani R; Mitchell LE; Allen-Graham J; Heriot NR; Kotsimbos T; Wilson JW
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jun; 46(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 27040359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using community based participatory research as a method for investigating electronic health records.
    Almond H; Cummings E; Turner P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():40-4. PubMed ID: 25676944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of standardized nomenclature in the electronic medical record.
    Klehr J; Hafner J; Spelz LM; Steen S; Weaver K
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2009; 20(4):169-80. PubMed ID: 19883454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disease specific advance care planning for heart failure patients: implementation in a large health system.
    Schellinger S; Sidebottom A; Briggs L
    J Palliat Med; 2011 Nov; 14(11):1224-30. PubMed ID: 21870958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for Adults with Severe Communication Impairments: Findings of Pilot Research.
    Hemsley B; Georgiou A; Balandin S; Carter R; Hill S; Higgins I; Van Vliet P; McCarthy S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 214():100-6. PubMed ID: 26210425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. eHealth-as-a-Service (eHaaS): a data-driven decision making approach in Australian context.
    Black A; Sahama T; Gajanayake R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():915-9. PubMed ID: 25160321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical areas of national electronic health record programs-is our focus correct?
    Deutsch E; Duftschmid G; Dorda W
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Mar; 79(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 20079685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Realist review to inform development of the electronic advance care plan for the personally controlled electronic health record in Australia.
    Skinner I; Smith C; Jaffray L
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 25290057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of bedside electronic medical record to improve quality of care in nursing facilities: a qualitative analysis.
    Rantz MJ; Alexander G; Galambos C; Flesner MK; Vogelsmeier A; Hicks L; Scott-Cawiezell J; Zwygart-Stauffacher M; Greenwald L
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Mar; 29(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 20975545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the personally controlled electronic health record: an Australian national survey.
    Lehnbom EC; Brien JE; McLachlan AJ
    Intern Med J; 2014 Apr; 44(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 24754689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new instrument for measuring clinician satisfaction with electronic health records.
    Sockolow PS; Weiner JP; Bowles KH; Lehmann HP
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Oct; 29(10):574-85. PubMed ID: 21543972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Northern Territory HealthConnect: shared electronic health record service implementation experiences and benefits realised in indigenous health.
    Moo S; Fletcher J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):297-301. PubMed ID: 17911726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Australia's National Medicines Policy using geographical mapping.
    Roughead EE; Monteith GR; Harvey KJ; Tett SE
    Intern Med J; 2002 Mar; 32(3):66-71. PubMed ID: 11885845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive beliefs and privacy concerns shape the future for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
    Lehnbom EC; Douglas HE; Makeham MA
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jan; 46(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 26813902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demographic characteristics of Australian health consumers who were early registrants for opt-in personally controlled electronic health records.
    Torrens E; Walker SM
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 28537210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.