97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2279707)
1. [Planning, execution and results of automated vaginal cytological diagnosis].
Naujoks H; Sprenger E
Gynakologe; 1990 Dec; 23(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 2279707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experience of a cyto-diagnostic laboratory (author's transl)].
Kern-Bontke E; Gräfin zu Eulenburg H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Feb; 34(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 4545208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Role of cytological method in oncology].
Agamova KA; Nikitina NI
Sov Med; 1975 Sep; (9):74-9. PubMed ID: 781865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [False negative cytologic findings].
Bauer H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1971 Jun; 31(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 5581798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximal efficiency of PAPNET in the diagnosis of infections in cervicovaginal smears.
Polus E; Karttunen TJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 May; 28(5):286-7. PubMed ID: 12722127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Gyn-cytology. Gyn health monitoring with good results].
Mattisson S; Svensson L
Vardfacket; 1991 Feb; 15(3):XIV-XVII. PubMed ID: 2053404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Image cytometry in automated cervical screening.
van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Feb; 1(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2488701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the financial impact of covering new screening technologies. The case of automated Pap smears.
McQuarrie HG; Ogden J; Costa M
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):898-906. PubMed ID: 11127101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System.
Patten SF; Lee JS; Nelson AC
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8604574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [How can the quality of our cytological smears be improved?].
Mellem C; Høeg K; Marton P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1984 May; 104(14):956-9. PubMed ID: 6463982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cytological diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix. Results during 1971].
Gerber E; Vajda D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1972 Oct; 92(10):813-28. PubMed ID: 4660894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cancer catcher. Neural net catches errors that slip through Pap tests.
Rennie J
Sci Am; 1990 May; 262(5):84. PubMed ID: 2333498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Plea for quality cytological specimens in the screening of cervical cancer].
Marie G; Barjot P; Crouet H; von Theobald P; Soutif C; Levy G
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 88(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 8351458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vaginal trichomoniasis as a cause of false cytologic positivity].
Tosolini GC; Gasparini M
Friuli Med; 1968; 23(6):807-17. PubMed ID: 5738496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Automated cytology: a challenge].
Goerttler K; Stöhr M
Pathologe; 1983 Mar; 4(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 6190157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The PAPNET system in cytological rescreening of cervical smears].
Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Apr; 49(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 9206764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Automatic processing of the medical file without previous codification: cytological use].
Pelzer A
Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr; 1968; 20(5):Suppl:391-3. PubMed ID: 4924246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Terminology of false negative and false positive Pap smears: "They're just worms".
Naryshkin S; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8834068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytomorphological assessment of benign and malignant dense hyperchromatic groups in cervicovaginal smears.
Harris MV; Cason Z; Benghuzzi H; Tucci M
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2000; 36():349-54. PubMed ID: 10834257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
