97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2279707)
21. [Automated analysis of cervical smears. II. - Automated discrimination between normal, dysplasic and cancer cells (author's transl)].
Pasteur X; Antoniadis A; Jourlin M; Laurent JL; Deage P; Haour P
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1981; 29(5):282-6. PubMed ID: 7305462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A method for staining centrosomes on cytological smears.
Paulete-Vanrell J
Mikroskopie; 1967; 22(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 4178193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An interactive image analysis system for quantitative cytology & to classify cervical cells.
Ramesh BV; Padaki VC; Hegde KS; Hazarika D; Verghese CA
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Dec; 96():338-43. PubMed ID: 1289246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. False-negative reactions due to incorrect image analysis by automated solid-phase red blood cell adherence assay.
Kang SH; Gloster E; White M; Swiderski I; Bradley L
Transfusion; 2010 Oct; 50(10):2282; discussion 2282-3. PubMed ID: 21039580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Gynecological cytology: too old to be a pop star but too young to die.
Longatto-Filho A; Schmitt FC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):672-3. PubMed ID: 17854085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [False negative reactions of cervical cytological examinations and defective follow-up after demonstration of abnormal cervical cytological findings].
Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Dec; 149(52):3571-4. PubMed ID: 3433574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears].
Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Disappointing effectiveness of population screening for cervical cancer].
Giard RW; Coebergh JW; Wijnen JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Feb; 141(7):317-21. PubMed ID: 9132604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Classification of cytological smears of the cervix with neuronal methods].
Kestler HA; Schulé M; Schwenker F; Neumann H; Mattfeldt T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999; 44(1-2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10194881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Fine-needle puncture as a diagnostic aid in gynecological tumors].
Jensen HK; Gram NC; Francis D
Ugeskr Laeger; 1974 Mar; 136(11):586-8. PubMed ID: 4821991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Automated methods of image analysis and their use in cell biology].
Filipiak K; Warchoł JB
Postepy Biochem; 1992; 38(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 1461845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Results of AutoPap system-assisted and manual cytologic screening. A comparison.
Wertlake P
J Reprod Med; 1999 Jan; 44(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9987733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficacy: a study of 63 false-negative smears.
Boon ME; Kok LP; Nygaard-Nielsen M; Holm K; Holund B
Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec; 7(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 7892166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis by the Papanicolaou smear.
Perl G
Mt Sinai J Med; 1970; 37(5):632-4. PubMed ID: 5312130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Standards of adequacy of cytologic examination of the female genital tract. Conclusions of study group on cytology.
Koss LG; Hicklin MD
Obstet Gynecol; 1974 May; 43(5):792-3. PubMed ID: 4595699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Microscopic diagnosis of dysbacteriosis in stained vaginal smears in clinical practice.
Verbruggen BS; Boon ME; Melkerl P; van Haaften M; Heintz AP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Oct; 34(10):686-91. PubMed ID: 16955476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Frozen section: Its role in gynaecological oncology.
Moodley M; Bramdev A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 25(7):629-34. PubMed ID: 16263532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Urinary cytology: device capabilities and requirements.
Koss LG; Bartels PH
Anal Quant Cytol; 1980; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 6990848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Control of mild and uncertain findings in vaginal cytological tests].
Bilstad K; Engh V; Stalsber H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1980 Aug; 100(23):1353-5. PubMed ID: 7456013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
