BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22798520)

  • 1. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of aortic stenosis diagnostic parameters: comparison of fast 3 direction and 1 direction phase contrast CMR and transthoracic echocardiography.
    da Silveira JS; Smyke M; Rich AV; Liu Y; Jin N; Scandling D; Dickerson JA; Rochitte CE; Raman SV; Potter LC; Ahmad R; Simonetti OP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):35. PubMed ID: 28270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.
    O'Brien KR; Gabriel RS; Greiser A; Cowan BR; Young AA; Kerr AJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2009 Nov; 11(1):49. PubMed ID: 19925667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Troger F; Lechner I; Reindl M; Tiller C; Holzknecht M; Pamminger M; Kremser C; Schwaiger J; Reinstadler SJ; Bauer A; Metzler B; Mayr A; Klug G
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 34986847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated left ventricular diastolic function evaluation from phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance and comparison with Doppler echocardiography.
    Bollache E; Redheuil A; Clément-Guinaudeau S; Defrance C; Perdrix L; Ladouceur M; Lefort M; De Cesare A; Herment A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E; Kachenoura N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Nov; 12(1):63. PubMed ID: 21062448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
    Woldendorp K; Bannon PG; Grieve SM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jun; 22(1):45. PubMed ID: 32536342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area.
    Garcia J; Marrufo OR; Rodriguez AO; Larose E; Pibarot P; Kadem L
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Apr; 14(1):23. PubMed ID: 22480269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity.
    Garcia J; Capoulade R; Le Ven F; Gaillard E; Kadem L; Pibarot P; Larose É
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Sep; 15(1):84. PubMed ID: 24053194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study.
    La Manna A; Sanfilippo A; Capodanno D; Salemi A; Polizzi G; Deste W; Cincotta G; Cadoni A; Marchese A; Figuera M; Ussia GP; Pittalà R; Privitera C; Tamburino C
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Dec; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 22202669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
    Morelli S; De Castro S; Cartoni D; Perrone C; Beni S; Bernardo ML; Ferrante L; Giordano M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.
    Maes F; Pierard S; de Meester C; Boulif J; Amzulescu M; Vancraeynest D; Pouleur AC; Pasquet A; Gerber B; Vanoverschelde JL
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 28292302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Crouch G; Tully PJ; Bennetts J; Sinhal A; Bradbrook C; Penhall AL; De Pasquale CG; Baker RA; Selvanayagam JB
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 May; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 25953135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic stenosis assessment from the 3-chamber cine: Ratio of balanced steady-state-free-precession (bSSFP) blood signal between the aorta and left ventricle predicts severity.
    Vimalesvaran K; Zaman S; Howard JP; Aziminia N; Giannoudi M; Procter H; Varela M; Uslu F; Ariff B; Linton N; Levelt E; Bharath AA; Cole GD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Summer; 26(1):100005. PubMed ID: 38211656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis.
    Stoddard MF; Arce J; Liddell NE; Peters G; Dillon S; Kupersmith J
    Am Heart J; 1991 Nov; 122(5):1415-22. PubMed ID: 1951006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peak flow measurements in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective comparative study between cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2D and 4D flow and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Hälvä R; Vaara SM; Peltonen JI; Kaasalainen TT; Holmström M; Lommi J; Suihko S; Rajala H; Kylmälä M; Kivistö S; Syväranta S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Nov; 23(1):132. PubMed ID: 34775954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Velocity distributions in the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Effect on the measurement of aortic valve area by using the continuity equation.
    Zhou YQ; Faerestrand S; Matre K
    Eur Heart J; 1995 Mar; 16(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 7789382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography using the continuity equation: a critical evaluation.
    Baumgartner H; Kratzer H; Helmreich G; Kuehn P
    Cardiology; 1990; 77(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 2397487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques].
    Nakamura K; Shiina T; Satomi G; Sakai K; Tamura K; Matsumura K; Umemura J; Magosaki N; Koyanagi H; Hirosawa K
    J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 3333519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow dependence of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis: assessment by application of the continuity equation.
    Rask LP; Karp KH; Eriksson NP
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1996; 9(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 8736013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.