These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22799284)

  • 1. Failing to forget: prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):965-71. PubMed ID: 22799284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 27172855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors.
    Matos P; Santos FH; Albuquerque PB
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 32043427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks.
    Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commission errors with forced response lag.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2380-2392. PubMed ID: 30862247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM; McDaniel MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 22082015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK; Rauvola RS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Jun; 31(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 27064599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fate of completed intentions.
    Anderson FT; Einstein GO
    Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):467-480. PubMed ID: 27206804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT
    Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):55-71. PubMed ID: 23916951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions.
    Beck SM; Ruge H; Walser M; Goschke T
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 52():37-50. PubMed ID: 24200918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commission errors of active intentions: the roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice.
    Boywitt CD; Rummel J; Meiser T
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(5):560-76. PubMed ID: 25599267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK; McDaniel MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 23355044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From retrospective to prospective memory research: a framework for investigating the deactivation of intentions.
    Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2021 Aug; 22(3):411-434. PubMed ID: 33694121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.
    Kurtz M; Scherbaum S; Walser M; Kanske P; Möschl M
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1590-1613. PubMed ID: 35212979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of age and focality on delay-execute prospective memory.
    Kelly AJ; Hertzog C; Hayes MG; Smith AD
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2013; 20(1):101-24. PubMed ID: 22639931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Racing to remember: A theory of decision control in event-based prospective memory.
    Strickland L; Loft S; Remington RW; Heathcote A
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):851-887. PubMed ID: 30080068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.