237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22799346)
1. Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience.
Parajuly SS; Lan PY; Yun MB; Gang YZ; Hua Z
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1447-52. PubMed ID: 22799346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasonic Elastography Research Based on a Multicenter Study: Adding Strain Ratio after 5-Point Scoring Evaluation or Not.
Mu WJ; Zhong WJ; Yao JY; Li LJ; Peng YL; Wang Y; Liu LS; Xiao Y; Liu SJ; Wu CJ; Jiang YX; Parajuly SS; Xu P; Hao Y; Li J; Luo BM; Zhi H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148330. PubMed ID: 26863208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of real-time strain sonoelastography in BI-RADS 4 and 5 breast masses.
Ozsoy A; Acar D; Barca AN; Aktas H; Araz L; Ozkaraoglu O; Yuksel E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Sep; 97(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 27211021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses.
Cho N; Moon WK; Kim HY; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20040770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of elastography strain rate ratio in benign and malignant BI-RADS-US 3-4 breast masses.
Li X; Sun W; Zhang H
Biomol Biomed; 2024 May; 24(3):625-632. PubMed ID: 38149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations of solid breast lesions by sonoelastography.
Yerli H; Yilmaz T; Kaskati T; Gulay H
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Feb; 30(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 21266555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation between idiopathic granulomatous mastitis and malignant breast lesions using strain ratio on ultrasonic elastography.
Yağcı B; Erdem Toslak I; Çekiç B; Öz M; Karakaş BR; Akdemir M; Yıldız S; Süren D; Bova D
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Oct; 98(10):685-691. PubMed ID: 28729183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
