57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22799623)
1. Assigning and combining probabilities in single-case studies.
Manolov R; Solanas A
Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):495-509. PubMed ID: 22799623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assigning and combining probabilities in single-case studies: a second study.
Manolov R; Solanas A
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1024-35. PubMed ID: 23526259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The parasite capacity of the host population].
Kozminskiĭ EV
Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11965643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the weighted z-test the best method for combining probabilities from independent tests?
Chen Z
J Evol Biol; 2011 Apr; 24(4):926-30. PubMed ID: 21401770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probability and Visual Aids for Assessing Intervention Effectiveness in Single-Case Designs: A Field Test.
Manolov R; Jamieson M; Evans JJ; Sierra V
Behav Modif; 2015 Sep; 39(5):691-720. PubMed ID: 26149395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining p-values in replicated single-case experiments with multivariate outcome.
Solmi F; Onghena P
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2014; 24(3-4):607-33. PubMed ID: 24593817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta- and statistical analysis of single-case intervention research data: quantitative gifts and a wish list.
Kratochwill TR; Levin JR
J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24606977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small group learning in medical education: a second look at the Springer, Stanne, and Donovan meta-analysis.
Colliver JA; Feltovich PJ; Verhulst SJ
Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 12632701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analytical issues for prevention intervention research.
Tobler N
NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():342-403. PubMed ID: 9243541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
Owens CM; Ferron JM
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Hong F; Breitling R
Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 18204063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding statistical significance.
Hayat MJ
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20445438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
Galyean ML; Wester DB
J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
Siadaty MS; Shu J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. II. Implications for multiple test adjustments.
Strug LJ; Hodge SE
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(4):200-9. PubMed ID: 16877867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
