BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22799625)

  • 1. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
    Rhemtulla M; Brosseau-Liard PÉ; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):354-73. PubMed ID: 22799625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sensitivity of structural equation modeling with ordinal data to underlying non-normality and observed distributional forms.
    Foldnes N; Grønneberg S
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):541-567. PubMed ID: 33793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.
    Li CH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.
    Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables.
    Smithson M; Verkuilen J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 16594767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing specific hypotheses by fitting underlying distributions to categorical data.
    Johnson WD; Elston RC; Wickremasinghe AR
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 8019584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for estimating the parameters of a linear model for ordered categorical data.
    Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):271-81. PubMed ID: 1581487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of ordinal categorical data with misclassification.
    Poon WY; Wang HB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):17-42. PubMed ID: 19364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model.
    Molenaar D; Dolan CV; Verhelst ND
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):293-317. PubMed ID: 19796474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional pairwise estimation in the Rasch model for ordered response categories using principal components.
    Andrich D; Luo G
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 12904672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.
    Flora DB; Curran PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):466-91. PubMed ID: 15598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.