These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2280014)

  • 1. Multicenter evaluation of Microring YT, a new method of yeast identification.
    Shankland GS; Hopwood V; Forster RA; Evans EG; Richardson MD; Warnock DW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Dec; 28(12):2808-10. PubMed ID: 2280014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Vandapel O; Duchesne MA; Mazoyer MA; Monget D; Lardy B; Lebeau B; Freney J; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1846-8. PubMed ID: 8784609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Yeast Identification panel.
    St Germain G; Beauchesne D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2296-9. PubMed ID: 1939587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical Wire and Equipment Company Microring YT.
    Frick MO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Sep; 29(9):2089-90. PubMed ID: 1812885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Microring YT system for identifying clinical yeast isolates.
    Ridgway EJ; Allen KD
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Sep; 44(9):775-7. PubMed ID: 1918410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards versus fluorimetric cards for identification of yeasts.
    Loïez C; Wallet F; Sendid B; Courcol RJ
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Dec; 56(4):455-7. PubMed ID: 16935457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Identification of yeasts of the Candida genus with a growth inhibition system: Microring YT].
    Torres-Rodríguez JM; Montsant-Montané L; Madrenys-Brunet N
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1994 Nov; 12(9):439-42. PubMed ID: 7811770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of BD Phoenix and vitek 2 systems for species identification of common and uncommon pathogenic yeasts.
    Posteraro B; Ruggeri A; De Carolis E; Torelli R; Vella A; De Maio F; Ricciardi W; Posteraro P; Sanguinetti M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 51(11):3841-5. PubMed ID: 23966500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
    el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Importance of selective media for recovery of yeasts from clinical specimens.
    Sandven P; Lassen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Nov; 37(11):3731-2. PubMed ID: 10523586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of VITEK 2 and RapID yeast plus systems for yeast species identification: experience at a large clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Sanguinetti M; Porta R; Sali M; La Sorda M; Pecorini G; Fadda G; Posteraro B
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1343-6. PubMed ID: 17287333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of accuracy of identification of pathogenic yeasts in microbiology laboratories in the United kingdom.
    Borman AM; Szekely A; Palmer MD; Johnson EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Aug; 50(8):2639-44. PubMed ID: 22649009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of pathogenic rare yeast species in clinical samples: comparison between phenotypical and molecular methods.
    Cendejas-Bueno E; Gomez-Lopez A; Mellado E; Rodriguez-Tudela JL; Cuenca-Estrella M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 May; 48(5):1895-9. PubMed ID: 20237094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of VITEK 2 with ITS2-fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species.
    Massonet C; Van Eldere J; Vaneechoutte M; De Baere T; Verhaegen J; Lagrou K
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 May; 42(5):2209-11. PubMed ID: 15131191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Biolog system for the identification of food and beverage yeasts.
    Praphailong W; Van Gestel M; Fleet GH; Heard GM
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 24(6):455-9. PubMed ID: 9203401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.