These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22800664)

  • 1. [Self-ligating vs. conventional brackets in the treatment of patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion: a clinical trial of dental and cephalometric analysis].
    Chen YP; Li S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 22800664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17693371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
    Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
    Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics.
    Celar AG; Onodera K; Bertl MH; Astl E; Bantleon HP; Sato S; Mitteroecker P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Aug; 17(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 24720396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
    Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Dental Arch Changes and Buccal Bone Thickness in Patients treated with Self-ligating Brackets.
    Ibiapina DJ; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro RL; Almeida MR; Mendonça DL; Conti AC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):434-9. PubMed ID: 27484594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of the plaster casts of Class II division 1 non-extraction patients treated with Alexander technique].
    Cao T; Wei S; Zhou YH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 48(9):518-22. PubMed ID: 24314276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
    Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
    Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of class II malocclusion and unerupted upper canines with self-ligating appliance.
    Bariani RCB; Guimarães CH; Moura WS; Ortolani CLF; Henriques JFC; Pereira-Bellini SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(3):391-395. PubMed ID: 29900927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
    Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of self-ligating and conventional brackets on dental arch width in non-extraction treatment: a meta analysis].
    Zhang DP; Liu J; Liu Y; Sun N; Yi JC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Jun; 23(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 25102887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
    Scott P; DiBiase AT; Sherriff M; Cobourne MT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical study of extraction treatment of Class II division I malocclusion with Empower self-ligating brackets].
    Chen XH; Hua YM; Xie XQ; Yu XJ; Wang J; Liu LM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Jun; 22(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 23852064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.
    Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.