BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22801421)

  • 1. Comparison of the angles and corresponding moments in the knee and hip during restricted and unrestricted squats.
    Lorenzetti S; Gülay T; Stoop M; List R; Gerber H; Schellenberg F; Stüssi E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2829-36. PubMed ID: 22801421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting.
    Bryanton MA; Kennedy MD; Carey JP; Chiu LZ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2820-8. PubMed ID: 22797000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinematics of the trunk and the lower extremities during restricted and unrestricted squats.
    List R; Gülay T; Stoop M; Lorenzetti S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1529-38. PubMed ID: 22990570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heel-Raised Foot Posture Does Not Affect Trunk and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Barbell Back Squat in Recreational Weight lifters.
    Lee SP; Gillis CB; Ibarra JJ; Oldroyd DF; Zane RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 30789547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Net joint moments and muscle activation in barbell squats without and with restricted anterior leg rotation.
    Chiu LZ; vonGaza GL; Jean LM
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jan; 35(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26930422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Biomechanical Comparison Between a High and Low Barbell Placement on Net Joint Moments, Kinematics, Muscle Forces, and Muscle-Specific Moments in 3 Repetition Maximum Back Squats.
    Larsen S; de Zee M; Kristiansen EL; van den Tillaar R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 38900172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the movement and the influence of load in the back squat exercise.
    McKean MR; Dunn PK; Burkett BJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1671-9. PubMed ID: 20508473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical investigation of a single-limb squat: implications for lower extremity rehabilitation exercise.
    Richards J; Thewlis D; Selfe J; Cunningham A; Hayes C
    J Athl Train; 2008; 43(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18833310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained individuals.
    Gullett JC; Tillman MD; Gutierrez GM; Chow JW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 19002072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of barbell back squat stance width on sagittal and frontal hip and knee kinetics.
    Lahti J; Hegyi A; Vigotsky AD; Ahtiainen JP
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Jan; 29(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 30230052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences and correlations in knee and hip mechanics during single-leg landing, single-leg squat, double-leg landing, and double-leg squat tasks.
    Donohue MR; Ellis SM; Heinbaugh EM; Stephenson ML; Zhu Q; Dai B
    Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(4):394-411. PubMed ID: 26275102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of hip external rotation on hip adductor and rectus femoris myoelectric activity during a dynamic parallel squat.
    Pereira GR; Leporace G; Chagas Dd; Furtado LF; Praxedes J; Batista LA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2749-54. PubMed ID: 20651607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of performing heavy-loaded barbell back squats to volitional failure on lower limb and lumbo-pelvis mechanics in skilled lifters.
    Brice SM; Doma K; Harland L; Spratford W
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Jan; 38(1):100-105. PubMed ID: 31638481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The acute effects of manipulating volume and load of back squats on countermovement vertical jump performance.
    Moir GL; Mergy D; Witmer C; Davis SE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1486-91. PubMed ID: 21293305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Greater Hip Moments in Rear-Foot-Elevated Split Squats Than in Conventional Back Squats With the Same Relative Intensity of Loads.
    Arakawa H; Mori M; Tanimoto M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2023 May; 37(5):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 36542838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of knee position on hip and knee torques during the barbell squat.
    Fry AC; Smith JC; Schilling BK
    J Strength Cond Res; 2003 Nov; 17(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 14636100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Biomechanical Comparison Between the Safety-Squat Bar and Traditional Barbell Back Squat.
    Johansson DG; Marchetti PH; Stecyk SD; Flanagan SP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):825-834. PubMed ID: 38595263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load-dependent mechanical demands of the lower extremity during the back and front squat.
    Krzyszkowski J; Kipp K
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Sep; 38(17):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 32544021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of weightlifting shoes on the kinetics and kinematics of the back squat.
    Legg HS; Glaister M; Cleather DJ; Goodwin JE
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar; 35(5):508-515. PubMed ID: 27096286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic knee control and movement strategies in athletes and non-athletes in side hops: Implications for knee injury.
    Markström JL; Grip H; Schelin L; Häger CK
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Aug; 29(8):1181-1189. PubMed ID: 30972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.