179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22801514)
1. Comparison of three hand dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of the measurements.
Amaral JF; Mancini M; Novo Júnior JM
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2012 Jun; 16(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 22801514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Jamar and Bodygrip Dynamometers for Handgrip Strength Measurement.
Guerra RS; Amaral TF; Sousa AS; Fonseca I; Pichel F; Restivo MT
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1931-1940. PubMed ID: 28640771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.
Kanauchi Y; Murase T; Nishiwaki M; Odagiri M; Wanezaki Y; Ishikawa H
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2023 Oct; 28(5):562-572. PubMed ID: 37881817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination the validity of the new developed Sport Experts® hand grip dynamometer, measuring continuity of force, and comparison with current Takei and Baseline® dynamometers.
Güçlüöver A; Kutlu M; Ciğerci AE; Esen HT; Demirkan E; Erdoğdu M
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2015 Nov; 55(11):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25289714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Grip Strength Measurements by Widely Used Three Dynamometers in Outpatients Aged 60 Years and Over.
Savas S; Kilavuz A; Kayhan Koçak FÖ; Cavdar S
J Clin Med; 2023 Jun; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer.
Shechtman O; Gestewitz L; Kimble C
J Hand Ther; 2005; 18(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 16059855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.
Kim M; Shinkai S
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Nov; 17(11):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 28517036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring handgrip strength in school children: inter-instrument reliability between Takei and Jamar.
Trajković N; Rančić D; Ilić T; Herodek R; Korobeynikov G; Pekas D
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1074. PubMed ID: 38212414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hand dynamometers in elderly people.
Guerra RS; Amaral TF
J Nutr Health Aging; 2009 Dec; 13(10):907-12. PubMed ID: 19924352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.
Mathiowetz V
Occup Ther Int; 2002; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12374997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.
Huang L; Liu Y; Lin T; Hou L; Song Q; Ge N; Yue J
BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 35840905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength.
Rolsted SK; Andersen KD; Dandanell G; Dall CH; Zilmer CK; Bülow K; Kristensen MT
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101692. PubMed ID: 38705572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge.
King TI
Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 23791323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.
Cildan Uysal S; Tonak HA; Kitis A
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 41(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 35283336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.
Molenaar HM; Zuidam JM; Selles RW; Stam HJ; Hovius SE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1053-9. PubMed ID: 18451398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.
Mühldorfer-Fodor M; Ziegler S; Harms C; Neumann J; Cristalli A; Kalpen A; Kundt G; Mittlmeier T; Prommersberger KJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1179-88. PubMed ID: 24935661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of psychometric properties between the Labin, a new electronic dynamometer, and the Jamar: Preliminary results in healthy subjects.
Conforto I; Samir C; Chausse F; Goldstein A; Pereira B; Coudeyre E
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 38(5):293-297. PubMed ID: 31386926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normative reference values for hand grip dynamometry in Spain. Association with lean mass.
Sánchez Torralvo FJ; Porras N; Abuín Fernández J; García Torres F; Tapia MJ; Lima F; Soriguer F; Gonzalo M; Rojo Martínez G; Olveira G
Nutr Hosp; 2018 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 29565156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years.
Hogrel JY
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jun; 16():139. PubMed ID: 26055647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.
Vermeulen J; Neyens JC; Spreeuwenberg MD; van Rossum E; Hewson DJ; de Witte LP
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2015; 38(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 25594521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
