BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22801787)

  • 1. Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons.
    Feuerbacher RL; Funk KH; Spight DH; Diggs BS; Hunter JG
    Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1026-30. PubMed ID: 22801787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety.
    Murji A; Luketic L; Sobel ML; Kulasegaram KM; Leyland N; Posner G
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4499-504. PubMed ID: 26895919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills: dual-task approach.
    Meneghetti AT; Pachev G; Zheng B; Panton ON; Qayumi K
    Surg Innov; 2012 Dec; 19(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 22170894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
    Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial.
    Palter VN; Grantcharov TP
    Ann Surg; 2014 Mar; 259(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 24503910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
    Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of distraction on simulated anterior segment surgical performance.
    Park J; Waqar S; Kersey T; Modi N; Ong C; Sleep T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1517-22. PubMed ID: 21782096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence and Characteristics of Interruptions and Distractions During Surgical Counts.
    Bubric KA; Biesbroek SL; Laberge JC; Martel JA; Litvinchuk SD
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2021 Sep; 47(9):556-562. PubMed ID: 34176758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.
    McNatt SS; Smith CD
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 11727075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification and interference of intraoperative distractions and interruptions in operating rooms.
    Antoniadis S; Passauer-Baierl S; Baschnegger H; Weigl M
    J Surg Res; 2014 May; 188(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24405613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective skills assessment and construct validation of a virtual reality temporal bone simulator.
    Khemani S; Arora A; Singh A; Tolley N; Darzi A
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 22858711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical resident performance on a virtual reality simulator correlates with operating room performance.
    Wohaibi EM; Bush RW; Earle DB; Seymour NE
    J Surg Res; 2010 May; 160(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 19261297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training.
    Mentis HM; Chellali A; Manser K; Cao CG; Schwaitzberg SD
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1713-24. PubMed ID: 26194261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.
    Rosen J; Hannaford B; Richards CG; Sinanan MN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the Effect of External Stressors and Cognitive Distraction on Microsurgical Skills and Performance.
    Carr S; McDermott BR; McInerney N; Hussey A; Byrne D; Potter S
    Front Surg; 2019; 6():77. PubMed ID: 32039230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of caffeine and taurine on simulated laparoscopy performed following sleep deprivation.
    Aggarwal R; Mishra A; Crochet P; Sirimanna P; Darzi A
    Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1666-72. PubMed ID: 21761394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the endoscopic sinus surgical simulator on operating room performance.
    Edmond CV
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jul; 112(7 Pt 1):1148-58. PubMed ID: 12169890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.
    Grantcharov TP; Kristiansen VB; Bendix J; Bardram L; Rosenberg J; Funch-Jensen P
    Br J Surg; 2004 Feb; 91(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 14760660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does a surgical simulator improve resident operative performance of laparoscopic tubal ligation?
    Banks EH; Chudnoff S; Karmin I; Wang C; Pardanani S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):541.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17980202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of lightly embalmed (fresh tissue) cadavers for resident laparoscopic training.
    Levine RL; Kives S; Cathey G; Blinchevsky A; Acland R; Thompson C; Pasic R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 16962531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.