These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22802543)

  • 21. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain.
    Al-Eisa E; Egan D; Deluzio K; Wassersug R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(3):E71-9. PubMed ID: 16449891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement of spinal range of motion in healthy individuals using an electromagnetic tracking device.
    Hsu CJ; Chang YW; Chou WY; Chiou CP; Chang WN; Wong CY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Feb; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18248285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How do elliptical machines differ from walking: a study of torso motion and muscle activity.
    Moreside JM; McGill SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):738-43. PubMed ID: 22534321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip.
    Lee RY; Wong TK
    Hum Mov Sci; 2002 Oct; 21(4):481-94. PubMed ID: 12450680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of measurements of lumbar spine sagittal mobility obtained with the flexible curve.
    Youdas JW; Suman VJ; Garrett TR
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1995 Jan; 21(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 7889027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style.
    Gill KP; Bennett SJ; Savelsbergh GJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1599-604. PubMed ID: 17621206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation of neck muscle activity in asymptomatic participants who show different lumbar spine motion patterns during prone hip extension.
    Bruno PA; Murphy DR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Oct; 34(8):525-32. PubMed ID: 21907414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Kinematic measurement of the lumbar spine and pelvis in the normal population.
    Peharec S; Jerković R; Bacić P; Azman J; Bobinac D
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Dec; 31(4):1039-42. PubMed ID: 18217455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
    Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.
    Renner SM; Natarajan RN; Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Guo BY; Andersson GB; An HS
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(6):1326-32. PubMed ID: 16843473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gross range of motion in the cervical spine: the effects of osteopathic muscle energy technique in asymptomatic subjects.
    Burns DK; Wells MR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Mar; 106(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 16585381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in bending stiffness and lumbar spine range of movement following lumbar mobilization and manipulation.
    Stamos-Papastamos N; Petty NJ; Williams JM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Jan; 34(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21237407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modulation of the tibial nerve H-reflex by mechanical stimulation of afferents in the lumbar spine.
    Burke JR; Bulbulian R
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 45(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 15861860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The range of motion of the cervical spine in children aged from 3 to 7 years - an electrogoniometric study.
    Lewandowski J; Szulc P
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2003 Nov; 62(4):459-61. PubMed ID: 14655141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.