128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22803625)
1. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers.
Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):822-7. PubMed ID: 22803625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of selected volatile contact allergens in different patch test chambers under different storage conditions.
Mose KF; Andersen KE; Christensen LP
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):172-9. PubMed ID: 22404192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Nov; 71(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 25231568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (lyral) in patch test preparations under varied storage conditions.
Hamann D; Hamann CR; Zimerson E; Bruze M
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(5):246-8. PubMed ID: 24030363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advance preparation of some patch test series should be avoided.
Buckley DA
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):708-9. PubMed ID: 23013310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the epoxides of cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamal show new cases of contact allergy?
Hagvall L; Niklasson IB; Luthman K; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Jun; 78(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 29603274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volatility of fragrance chemicals: patch testing implications.
Gilpin SJ; Hui X; Maibach HI
Dermatitis; 2009; 20(4):200-7. PubMed ID: 19804696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are contact allergens stable in patch test preparations? Investigation of the degradation of d-limonene hydroperoxides in petrolatum.
Nilsson U; Magnusson K; Karlberg O; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Mar; 40(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 10073439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between positive patch tests to epoxy resin and fragrance mix I ingredients.
Andersen KE; Christensen LP; Vølund A; Johansen JD; Paulsen E
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 19260913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Menné T; Avnstorp C; Kasting GB; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 19486000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
Suneja T; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 135(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 8949436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances.
van Oosten EJ; Schuttelaar ML; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19825093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of the homogeneity of methacrylate allergens in commercially available patch test preparations.
Mose KF; Andersen KE; Christensen LP
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Oct; 69(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 23808831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A contemporary Fischer-Maibach investigation: variations in patch test delivery systems and implications for standardization.
Hamann D; Hamann CR; Hamann C
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(6):302-12. PubMed ID: 24201463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
