140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22804505)
1. An audit of dermatopathology requisitions: hand written vs. electronic medical record data entry accuracy.
Kinonen CL; Watkin WG; Gleason BC; Johnson CE; Thomas AB; Cibull TL
J Cutan Pathol; 2012 Sep; 39(9):850-2. PubMed ID: 22804505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outpatient order accuracy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of requisition order entry accuracy in 660 institutions.
Valenstein P; Meier F
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Dec; 123(12):1145-50. PubMed ID: 10583917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries.
Callen J; McIntosh J; Li J
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jan; 79(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19800840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compliance of reviewing portal images on radiographic film vs an electronic medical record.
Chen GG; Hammoud A; Komajda M; Konski A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):495-7. PubMed ID: 22748791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the quality of radiology requisitions for intensive care unit patients.
Cohen MD; Curtin S; Lee R
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 16428060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring the impact of the electronic medical record on the quality of laboratory test ordering practices.
Georgiou A; Vecellio E; Toouli G; Eigenstetter A; Li L; Wilson R; Westbrook JI
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():33-8. PubMed ID: 23823285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-sectional comparison of electronic and paper medical records on medication counseling in primary care clinics: a Southern Primary-Care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) study.
Kuo GM; Mullen PD; McQueen A; Swank PR; Rogers JC
J Am Board Fam Med; 2007; 20(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 17341753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selecting an electronic medical record system for small physician practices.
duPont NC; Koeninger D; Guyer JD; Travers D
N C Med J; 2009; 70(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 19999516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.
Jain A; Kumari S; Marwaha N; Sharma RR
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus; 2015 Jun; 31(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 25825571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Establishment of an electronic medical record in a psychiatric hospital: evolution of professionals' perceptions].
Boyer L; Renaud MH; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Fieschi M; Samuelian JC
Encephale; 2010 Jun; 36(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 20620266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of computer order entry on prevention of serious medication errors in hospitalized children.
Walsh KE; Landrigan CP; Adams WG; Vinci RJ; Chessare JB; Cooper MR; Hebert PM; Schainker EG; McLaughlin TJ; Bauchner H
Pediatrics; 2008 Mar; 121(3):e421-7. PubMed ID: 18310162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference?
Elder NC; McEwen TR; Flach J; Gallimore J; Pallerla H
Fam Med; 2010 May; 42(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 20455108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.
Denomme LB; Terry AL; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
Fam Med; 2011 Oct; 43(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 22002775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Case study: analysis of end-user requests on electronic medical record and computerized physician order entry system of Seoul National University Hospital in Korea.
Kim YA; Shin SY; Jo EM; Park CH; Hwang MA; Kim KH; Chung CK
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):169-72. PubMed ID: 20841671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics.
Roukema J; Los RK; Bleeker SE; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Moll HA
Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16396855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Educational impact of the electronic medical record.
Schenarts PJ; Schenarts KD
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 22208841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance.
Ahmed A; Chandra S; Herasevich V; Gajic O; Pickering BW
Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1626-34. PubMed ID: 21478739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using your electronic medical record for research: a primer for avoiding pitfalls.
Terry AL; Chevendra V; Thind A; Stewart M; Marshall JN; Cejic S
Fam Pract; 2010 Feb; 27(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19828572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interfaces between electronic medical record (EMR/EHR) technology and people in American medicine: insight. imagination, and relationships in clinical practice.
Stein HF
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2012 Aug; 105(8):316-9. PubMed ID: 23091977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
