234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22808760)
1. Who is responsible for inadequate lymph node retrieval after colorectal surgery: surgeon or pathologist?
Sinan H; Demirbas S; Ersoz N; Ozerhan IH; Yagci G; Akyol M; Cetiner S
Acta Chir Belg; 2012; 112(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 22808760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes' stage B disease.
Evans MD; Barton K; Rees A; Stamatakis JD; Karandikar SS
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Feb; 10(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 17477849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modifiable factors that influence colon cancer lymph node sampling and examination.
Valsecchi ME; Leighton J; Tester W
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2010 Jul; 9(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 20643621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.
Cianchi F; Palomba A; Boddi V; Messerini L; Pucciani F; Perigli G; Bechi P; Cortesini C
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 11865379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement of 10-year survival by Japanese radical lymph node dissection in patients with Dukes' B and C colorectal cancer: a 17-year retrospective study.
Mukai M; Ito I; Mukoyama S; Tajima T; Saito Y; Nakasaki H; Sato S; Makuuchi H
Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 12792747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study.
Baxter NN; Virnig DJ; Rothenberger DA; Morris AM; Jessurun J; Virnig BA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 15687365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer.
Sarli L; Bader G; Iusco D; Salvemini C; Mauro DD; Mazzeo A; Regina G; Roncoroni L
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Jan; 41(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 15661553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer resection specimens: national standards are achievable, and low numbers are associated with reduced survival.
Norwood MG; Sutton AJ; West K; Sharpe DP; Hemingway D; Kelly MJ
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 12(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 19207700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?
Peeples C; Shellnut J; Wasvary H; Riggs T; Sacksner J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1517-23. PubMed ID: 20940600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Impact of meticulousness of pathologists on lymph node harvest after radical resection of invasive rectal carcinoma].
Wang H; Fu CG; Zheng JM; Gong HF; Tao LY; Yu ED; Zhang W; Liu LJ; Hao LQ; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 12(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 19921565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph node retrieval from colorectal resection specimens for adenocarcinoma: is it worth the extra effort to find at least 12 nodes?
Fan L; Levy M; Aguilar CE; Mertens RB; Dhall D; Frishberg DP; Wang HL
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1377-83. PubMed ID: 20969717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colon cancer and low lymph node count: who is to blame?
Jakub JW; Russell G; Tillman CL; Lariscy C
Arch Surg; 2009 Dec; 144(12):1115-20. PubMed ID: 20026828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metastatic potential in T1 and T2 colorectal cancer.
Fang WL; Chang SC; Lin JK; Wang HS; Yang SH; Jiang JK; Chen WC; Lin TC
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(66):1688-91. PubMed ID: 16334758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer is dependent on many factors--the role of the tumor, the patient, the surgeon, the radiotherapist, and the pathologist.
Mekenkamp LJ; van Krieken JH; Marijnen CA; van de Velde CJ; Nagtegaal ID;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Oct; 33(10):1547-53. PubMed ID: 19661781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of total lymph node number in patients with T1-4N0M0 colorectal cancer.
Berberoglu U
Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1689-93. PubMed ID: 15532806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimal number of lymph nodes that need to be examined for adequate staging of colorectal cancer--factors influencing lymph node harvest.
Horzic M; Kopljar M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(61):86-9. PubMed ID: 15783001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist.
Morris EJ; Maughan NJ; Forman D; Quirke P
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jun; 25(18):2573-9. PubMed ID: 17577036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors that influence lymph node retrieval in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of the laparoscopic versus open approach.
Yacoub M; Swistak S; Chan S; Chichester T; Dawood S; Berri R; Hawasli A
Am J Surg; 2013 Mar; 205(3):339-42; discussion 342. PubMed ID: 23414957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer.
Manilich EA; Kiran RP; Radivoyevitch T; Lavery I; Fazio VW; Remzi FH
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Nov; 213(5):579-588, 588.e1-2. PubMed ID: 21925905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
